IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/halshs-00926604.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Household-level expenditure on protective measures against mosquitoes on the island of la réunion, france

Author

Listed:
  • Josselin Thuilliez

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Claire Bellia

    (IRD [Réunion] - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement)

  • Jean-Sébastien Dehecq

    (Agence Régionale de Santé Océan Indien - ARS - Agence Régionale de la Santé)

  • Olivier Reilhes

    (Agence Régionale de Santé Océan Indien - ARS - Agence Régionale de la Santé)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For decades La Réunion has experienced a number of epidemics that have resulted in efforts to control the density of Aedes species on this Island. This study was conducted to assess household-level expenditure on protective measures against mosquito nuisance on the Island of La Réunion in 2012. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data was collected during a cross-sectional survey of 1024 households and used to determine the relationship between the use of chemically-based protective measures and subjective and objective indicators of the density of Aedes albopictus. The average household expenditure in July 2012 was USD 9.86 and the total household-level expenditure over a one-year period was extrapolated to USD 28.05million (range: USD 25.58 million to USD 30.76 million). Much of this money was spent on measures thought to be relatively ineffective against Aedes mosquitoes. Expenditure on protective measures was not influenced by the level of knowledge on mosquitoes or by the visual nuisance they generated at home, but rather by the perception of risk related to a future epidemic of chikungunya and socioeconomic factors. Most importantly, household spending on protective measures was found to be influenced by a measure of zone-level mosquito density (the Breteau index), but not by objective indicators of the presence of mosquitoes within or around the house. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Household-level expenditure on chemically-based protective measures is high when compared to the investment made by public entities to achieve vector control, and it is differentially influenced by subjective and objective measures of mosquito density. The current situation could be improved, firstly by ensuring that the public is well-informed about mosquitoes and the effectiveness of various protective measures, and secondly by implementing interventions that could either complement current vector-control strategies and improve their effectiveness on a country-level, or that would steer the population toward the appropriate behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Josselin Thuilliez & Claire Bellia & Jean-Sébastien Dehecq & Olivier Reilhes, 2014. "Household-level expenditure on protective measures against mosquitoes on the island of la réunion, france," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00926604, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-00926604
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beniamino Caputo & Mattia Manica & Gianluca Russo & Angelo Solimini, 2020. "Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards the Tiger Mosquito Aedes Albopictus. A Questionnaire Based Survey in Lazio Region (Italy) before the 2017 Chikungunya Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Florence Lamaurt & Olga De Santis & Julie Ramis & Cédric Schultz & Ana Rivadeneyra & Mathias Waelli & Antoine Flahault, 2022. "Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices Regarding Dengue in La Réunion Island, France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Massimo Canali & Stefano Rivas-Morales & Philippe Beutels & Claudio Venturelli, 2017. "The Cost of Arbovirus Disease Prevention in Europe: Area-Wide Integrated Control of Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus , in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Jeffrey A. Brown & Kelli L. Larson & Susannah B. Lerman & Alexandreana Cocroft & Sharon J. Hall, 2021. "Resident Perceptions of Mosquito Problems Are More Influenced by Landscape Factors than Mosquito Abundance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-00926604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.