This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Governing the Co-Existence of GM Crops - Ex-Ante Regulation and Ex-Post Liability under Uncertainty and Irreversibility

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Volker Beckmann () (Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus, Fachgebiet Ressourcenökonomie, Luisenstr. 56, 10099 Berlin)
Claudio Soregaroli (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy)
Justus Wesseler () (Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The future institutional environment for the co-existence of genetically modified (GM) crops, conventional crops and organic crops in Europe combines measures of ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability rules. Against this background we ask the following two questions: How does ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability under irreversibility and uncertainty affect the adoption of GM crops? What are the implications for regional agglomeration of GM and non-GM crops? Ex-ante regulations and ex-post liabilities for using GM crops will induce additional costs. These costs are modelled in a classical way. The model is advanced by including irreversibility and uncertainty and taking into account transaction costs of negotiating possible solutions with neighbouring farmers which are assumed to be partially irreversible. The results show that the design of ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability increases the value of waiting and results in less immediate adoption of the GM technology. Additionally, the rules and regulations in the EU do provide incentives for the regional agglomeration of GM and non-GM crops that are mainly driven by the irreversibility effect of the ex-ante regulatory and ex-post liability costs.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/struktur/institute/wisola/fg/ress/publikationen/icar/122006beckmannetal.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin in its series ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) with number 1206.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 20 pages
Date of creation: Mar 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hah:icardp:1206

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Philippstr. 13, 10115 Berlin
Phone: +49 (0)30 2093 6066
Fax: +49 (0)30 2093 6325
Web page: http://www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/struktur/institute/wisola/fg/ress
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Volker Beckmann).

Related research
Keywords: Co-existence; GM crops; liability law; public regulation; technology adoption;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability
O33 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Murray, Catherine, 2005. "Social Capital and Cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe: A Theoretical Perspective," Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources Discussion Papers 18831, Humboldt University Berlin, Institute for Agricultural Economic and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
  2. Ayalneh Bogale & Benedikt Korf, 2005. "To Share or Not To Share? - (Non-)Violence, Scarcity and Resource Access in Somali Region, Ethiopia," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 1005, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Robert D. Weaver & Justus Wessler, 2004. "Monopolistic pricing power for transgenic crops when technology adopters face irreversible benefits and costs," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(15), pages 969-973, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Demont, Matty & Wesseler, Justus & Tollens, Eric, 2003. "Biodiversity versus Transgenic Sugar Beet: The One Euro Question," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25831, International Association of Agricultural Economists. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Beckmann, Volker & Wesseler, Justus, 2005. "Spatial Dimension Of Externalities And The Coase Theorem: Implications For Co-Existence Of Transgenic Crops," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19534, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]
  6. Kolstad, Charles D & Ulen, Thomas S & Johnson, Gary V, 1990. "Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(4), pages 888-901, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Timothy Moss, 2005. "?Dissecting Institutions? - Bestandteile einer institutionellen Konfiguration am Beispiel der Wasserwirtschaft," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 0705, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
  8. Leger, Andreanne, 2005. "Intellectual property rights in Mexico: Do they play a role?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1865-1879, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Bekele Hundie, 2006. "Explaining Changes of Property Rights among Afar Pastoralists, Ethiopia," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 1406, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
  2. Skevas, T. & Fevereiro, P. & Wesseler, J., 2008. "Coping with ex ante Regulations and ex post Liability Rules for Planting Bt-maize – The Portuguese Experience," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44189, European Association of Agricultural Economists. [Downloadable!]
  3. Falck-Zepeda, José & Kilkuwe, Enoch & Wesseler, Justus, 2008. "Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions," IFPRI discussion papers 767, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS is also providing many rankings, for example of authors and institutions.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.