This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

To Share or Not To Share? - (Non-)Violence, Scarcity and Resource Access in Somali Region, Ethiopia

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Ayalneh Bogale () (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Alemaya, P.O. Box 170, Alemaya, Ethiopia)
Benedikt Korf () (Department of Geography, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, Liverpool L69 7ZT, UK)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

It is often argued that environmental scarcity was a trigger and source of violent conflict, in particular in African countries. At the root of such arguments is a simple environmental determinism, which understands scarcity as undermining co-operative relationships between competing resource users. Robert Kaplan popularised this thesis in his argument about ?The Coming Anarchy?, where he interpreted recent civil wars in Africa as an advent of a fundamental environmental crisis. In our view, this conception disregards the crucial role of local-level institutions in governing competing resource claims. In this paper, we present a case study from the violence-prone Somali Region, Ethiopia. We analyse how agro-pastoralist communities develop sharing arrangements on pasture resources with intruding pastoralist communities in drought years, even though this places additional pressure on their grazing resource. A household survey investigates the determinants for different households in the agro-pastoralist community, asset-poor and wealthy ones, to enter into different types of sharing arrangements. Our findings suggest that resource sharing offers asset-poor households opportunities to stabilise and enhance their asset-base in drought years, providing incentives for co-operative rather than conflictive relations with intruding pastoralists. We conclude that it may depend on potential incentives arising from institutional arrangements, whether competing resource claims in periods of environmental scarcity are resolved peacefully or violently.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/struktur/institute/wisola/fg/ress/publikationen/icar/102005bogalekorf.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin in its series ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) with number 1005.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 28 pages
Date of creation: Jul 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hah:icardp:1005

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Philippstr. 13, 10115 Berlin
Phone: +49 (0)30 2093 6066
Fax: +49 (0)30 2093 6325
Web page: http://www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/struktur/institute/wisola/fg/ress
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Volker Beckmann).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Bromley, D.W. & Cernea, M.M., 1989. "The Management Of Common Property Natural Resources - Some Conceptual And Operational Fallacies," World Bank - Discussion Papers 57, World Bank.
  2. North, Douglass C, 1991. "Institutions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 97-112, Winter. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Azam, J.P., 2001. "The Redistributive State and Conflicts in Africa," Working Papers Series 2001-3, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
  4. Gebremedhin, Berhanu & Pender, John & Tesfay, Girmay, 2003. "Community natural resource management: the case of woodlots in Northern Ethiopia," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(01), pages 129-148, January. [Downloadable!]
  5. Leger, Andreanne, 2005. "Intellectual property rights in Mexico: Do they play a role?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1865-1879, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Tatiana Kluvánková-Oravská & Veronika Chobotová, 2006. "Shifting Governance in Slovensky Raj National Park," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 1506, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
  2. Volker Beckmann & Claudio Soregaroli & Justus Wesseler, 2006. "Governing the Co-Existence of GM Crops - Ex-Ante Regulation and Ex-Post Liability under Uncertainty and Irreversibility," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 1206, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
  3. Franz Gatzweiler & Jörg Volkmann, 2007. "Beyond Economic Efficiency in Biodiversity Conservation," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 1807, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
  4. Andreas Thiel, 2006. "Institutions of Sustainability and Multifunctional Landscapes, Lessons from the Case of the Algarve," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 1306, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
  5. Stefan Jungcurt & Thomas Meyer, 2006. "Consolidation, Delimitation and Stalemate - Disruptive Interplay and Strategic Incentives in the CBD-TRIPS Relationship," ICAR Discussion Papers (Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources) 1606, Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Data contributors to RePEc receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-24.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.