This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

AIDS, Access to Medicines, and the Different Roles of the Brazilian and South African Governments in Global Health Governance

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Jan Peter Wogart () (GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies)
Gilberto Calcagnotto () (GIGA Institute of Latin American Studies)
Wolfgang Hein () (GIGA Institute of Latin American Studies)
Christian von Soest () (GIGA Institute of African Affairs)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The present article illustrates how the main actors in global health governance (GHG)— governments, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), intergovernmental organizations (IOs), and transnational pharmaceutical companies (TNPCs)—have been interacting and, as a result, modifying the global health architecture in general and AIDS treatment in particular. Using the concept of “power types” (Keohane/Martin) and “interfaces” (Norman Long), the authors examine the conflicts among major GHG actors that have arisen surrounding the limited access to medicines for fighting HIV/AIDS basically as a result of the Agreement on Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), in force since 1995. They then analyze the efforts of Brazil and South Africa to obtain fast and low-cost access to antiretroviral medication against AIDS. They conclude that while policy makers in the two countries have used different approaches to tackle the AIDS problem, they have been able, with the support of NGOs, to modify TRIPS and change some WTO rules at the global level along legal interfaces. At the national level the results of the fight against AIDS have been encouraging for Brazil, but not for South Africa, where authorities denied the challenge for a prolonged period of time. The authors see the different outcomes as a consequence of Brazil’s ability to combine discoursive, legal, administrative, and resource-based interfaces.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://repec.giga-hamburg.de/pdf/giga_08_wp86_wogart-etal.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies in its series GIGA Working Paper Series with number 86.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: Sep 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:gig:wpaper:86

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Neuer Jungfernstieg 21, D-20354 Hamburg
Phone: +49 (0)40 42825-593
Fax: +49 (0)40 42825-547
Email:
Web page: http://www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Martin Beck).

Related research
Keywords: global health governance; HIV/AIDS in Brazil and South Africa; discoursive; legal; organizational and resource-based interfaces; WTO; transnational pharmaceutical companies; NGOs;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Risse, Thomas, 2000. ""Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(01), pages 1-39, January. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS uses the data collected within the RePEc project, the largest online bibliographic database in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-30.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.