This paper introduces a class of games designed to study dynamic, endogenous reform of political institutions. Dynamic political games (DPGs) are dynamic games in which institutional choice is both recursive and instrumental. Future political aggregation rules are decided under current ones, and institutional choices do not affect payoffs or technology directly. We examine properties of the Markovian equilibria of DPGs. In any equilibrium, institutional reform occurs if the subsequent political rule is chosen to be different than the present one. Which environments exhibit institutional reform and which tend toward institutional stability? Private (public) sector decisions are said to be inessential if, roughly, they can always be replaced by decisions in the public (private) sector in a social planner's payoff. We show that if the private sector is inessential, then institutional reform never occurs. However, if public sector decisions are inessential, then institutional reform must occur. The result suggests that an ineffective private sector is conducive to institutional stability, while an ineffective public sector is conducive to change. We also address the ``political fixed point problem" that arises in a model of recursive institutional choice. Namely, the current political rule (e.g., majority voting) admits a solution only if all feasible political rules admit solutions in all future dates. If the class of political rules is dynamically consistent then DPGs are shown to admit political fixed points. This result is used to prove two equilibrium existence theorems, one of which implies that all decision rules are smooth functions of the economic state
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Georgetown University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
gueconwpa~04-04-07.
Length: Date of creation: Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:geo:guwopa:gueconwpa~04-04-07
Contact details of provider: Postal: Georgetown University Department of Economics Washington, DC 20057-1036 Phone: 202-687-6074 Fax: 202-687-6102 Email: Web page: http://econ.georgetown.edu/
Order Information: Postal: Marcia Suss Administrative Officer Georgetown University Department of Economics Washington, DC 20057-1036 Email: Web: http://econ.georgetown.edu/
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Marcia Suss).
Find related papers by JEL classification: C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
William Jack & Roger Lagunoff, 2003.
"Dynamic Enfranchisement,"
Wallis Working Papers
WP36, University of Rochester - Wallis Institute of Political Economy.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
William Jack & Roger Lagunoff, .
"Dynamic Enfrachisement,"
Working Papers
gueconwpa~03-03-03, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]