IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gbl/wpaper/2018-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Growth and agglomeration in the heterogeneous space: A generalized AK approach

Author

Listed:
  • Boucekkine, R.
  • Fabbri, G.
  • Federico, S.
  • Gozzi, F.

Abstract

We provide an optimal growth spatio-temporal setting with capital accumulation and diffusion across space in order to study the link between economic growth triggered by capital spatio-temporal dynamics and agglomeration across space. The technology is AK, K being broad capital. The social welfare function is Benthamite. In sharp contrast to the related literature, which considers homogeneous space, we derive optimal location outcomes for any given space distributions for technology and population. Both the transitional spatio-temporal dynamics and the asymptotic spatial distributions are computed in closed form. Concerning the latter, we find, among other results, that: (i) due to inequality aversion, the consumption per capital distribution is much atter than the distribution of capital per capita; (ii) endogeneous spillovers inherent in capital spatio-temporal dynamics occur as capital distribution is much less concentrated than the (pre-specified) technological distribution; (iii) the distance to the center (or to the core) is an essential determinant of the shapes of the asymptotic distributions, that is relative location matters.

Suggested Citation

  • Boucekkine, R. & Fabbri, G. & Federico, S. & Gozzi, F., 2018. "Growth and agglomeration in the heterogeneous space: A generalized AK approach," Working Papers 2018-02, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
  • Handle: RePEc:gbl:wpaper:2018-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gael.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/sites/gael/files/doc-recherche/WP/A2018/gael2018-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levhari, David & Oron, Yitzhak & Pines, David, 1978. "A note on unequal treatment of equals in an urban setting," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 278-284, April.
    2. Boucekkine, R. & Camacho, C. & Fabbri, G., 2013. "Spatial dynamics and convergence: The spatial AK model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2719-2736.
    3. Anders Aslund & Marek Dabrowski, 2008. "Challenges of Globalization: Imbalances and Growth," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 4181, October.
    4. Boucekkine, Raouf & Camacho, Carmen & Zou, Benteng, 2009. "Bridging The Gap Between Growth Theory And The New Economic Geography: The Spatial Ramsey Model," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 20-45, February.
    5. Raouf Boucekkine & David de la Croix & Dominique Peeters, 2007. "Early Literacy Achievements, Population Density, and the Transition to Modern Growth," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 5(1), pages 183-226, March.
    6. Treb Allen & Costas Arkolakis, 2014. "Trade and the Topography of the Spatial Economy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(3), pages 1085-1140.
    7. Thomas Piketty & Gabriel Zucman, 2014. "Capital is Back: Wealth-Income Ratios in Rich Countries 1700–2010," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(3), pages 1255-1310.
    8. Ciccone, Antonio & Hall, Robert E, 1996. "Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(1), pages 54-70, March.
    9. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    10. Dmitriev, Mikhail & Comin, Diego & Rossi-Hansberg, Esteban, 2012. "The Spatial Diffusion of Technology," CEPR Discussion Papers 9208, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Pascal Mossay, 2003. "Increasing Returns And Heterogeneity In A Spatial Economy," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-04, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    12. World Bank, 2016. "World Development Indicators 2016," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 23969, December.
    13. Lopez, Humberto, 2008. "The social discount rate : estimates for nine Latin American countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4639, The World Bank.
    14. Edwin S. Mills & James MacKinnon, 1973. "Notes on the New Urban Economics," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 4(2), pages 593-601, Autumn.
    15. Boucekkine, R. & Fabbri, G. & Gozzi, F., 2014. "Egalitarianism under population change: Age structure does matter," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 86-100.
    16. Klaus Desmet & Esteban Rossi‐Hansberg, 2010. "On Spatial Dynamics," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 43-63, February.
    17. Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot, 1998. "original: Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 32(1), pages 7-37.
    18. Mossay, Pascal, 2003. "Increasing returns and heterogeneity in a spatial economy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 419-444, July.
    19. David N. Weil & Oded Galor, 2000. "Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and Beyond," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 806-828, September.
    20. Robert B. Barsky & F. Thomas Juster & Miles S. Kimball & Matthew D. Shapiro, 1997. "Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 537-579.
    21. Fabbri, Giorgio, 2016. "Geographical structure and convergence: A note on geometry in spatial growth models," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 114-136.
    22. Giorgio Fabbri & Fausto Gozzi & Andrzej Swiech, 2017. "Stochastic Optimal Control in Infinite Dimensions - Dynamic Programming and HJB Equations," Post-Print hal-01505767, HAL.
    23. Martin, Philippe & Rogers, Carol Ann, 1995. "Industrial location and public infrastructure," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 335-351, November.
    24. Paulo B. Brito, 2022. "The dynamics of growth and distribution in a spatially heterogeneous world," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(3), pages 311-350, September.
    25. Brock, William & Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 2008. "Diffusion-induced instability and pattern formation in infinite horizon recursive optimal control," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 2745-2787, September.
    26. Wildasin, David E., 1986. "Spatial variation of the marginal utility of income and unequal treatment of equals," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 125-129, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuelle Augeraud-Véron & Raouf Boucekkine & Vladimir Veliov, 2019. "Distributed Optimal Control Models in Environmental Economics: A Review," AMSE Working Papers 1902, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    2. Boucekkine, R. & Fabbri, G. & Federico, S. & Gozzi, F., 2020. "Control theory in infinite dimension for the optimal location of economic activity: The role of social welfare function," Working Papers 2020-02, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    3. Boucekkine, R. & Fabbri, G. & Federico, S. & Gozzi, F., 2020. "Control theory in infinite dimension for the optimal location of economic activity: The role of social welfare function," Working Papers 2020-02, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    4. Xepapadeas, Anastasios & Yannacopoulos, Athanasios N., 2023. "Spatial growth theory: Optimality and spatial heterogeneity," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Raouf Boucekkine & Giorgio Fabbri & Salvatore Federico & Fausto Gozzi, 2020. "Optimal location of economic activity and population density: The role of the social welfare function," AMSE Working Papers 2003, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    6. Spyridon Tsangaris & Anastasios Xepapadeas & Athanasios Yannacopoulos, 2022. "Spatial externalities, R&D spillovers, and endogenous technological change," DEOS Working Papers 2225, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    7. Carmen Camacho & Agustín Pérez-Barahona, 2017. "The diffusion of economic activity across space: a new approach," PSE Working Papers halshs-01670532, HAL.
    8. Paulo B. Brito, 2022. "The dynamics of growth and distribution in a spatially heterogeneous world," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(3), pages 311-350, September.
    9. Camacho, Carmen & Pérez-Barahona, Agustín, 2015. "Land use dynamics and the environment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 96-118.
    10. Giorgio FABBRI, 2014. "Ecological Barriers and Convergence: a Note on Geometry in Spatial Growth Models," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2014014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    11. Desmet, Klaus & Henderson, J. Vernon, 2015. "The Geography of Development Within Countries," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 1457-1517, Elsevier.
    12. Torre, Davide La & Liuzzi, Danilo & Marsiglio, Simone, 2021. "Transboundary pollution externalities: Think globally, act locally?," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Fabbri, Giorgio, 2016. "Geographical structure and convergence: A note on geometry in spatial growth models," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 114-136.
    14. José M. Gaspar, 2018. "A prospective review on New Economic Geography," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 237-272, September.
    15. Breinlich, Holger & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Temple, Jonathan R.W., 2014. "Regional Growth and Regional Decline," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 4, pages 683-779, Elsevier.
    16. Albeverio, Sergio & Mastrogiacomo, Elisa, 2022. "Large deviation principle for spatial economic growth model on networks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Camacho, Carmen & Zou, Benteng & Briani, Maya, 2008. "On the dynamics of capital accumulation across space," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 451-465, April.
    18. Giorgio Fabbri, 2014. "Ecological Barriers and Convergence: A Note on Geometry in Spatial Growth Models," Documents de recherche 14-05, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.
    19. La Torre, Davide & Liuzzi, Danilo & Marsiglio, Simone, 2015. "Pollution diffusion and abatement activities across space and over time," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 48-63.
    20. Carmen Camacho & Alexandre Cornet, 2021. "Diffusion of soil pollution in an agricultural economy. The emergence of regions, frontiers and spatial patterns," PSE Working Papers halshs-02652191, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    GROWTH; AGGLOMERATION; HETEROGENEOUS AND CONTINUOUS SPACE; CAPITAL MOBILITY; INFINITE DIMENSIONAL OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gbl:wpaper:2018-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrien Hervouet (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inragfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.