This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Downstream labeling and upstream competition Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Bonroy, O.
Lemarie, S.
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
This paper analyses the impact of labeling in a context where the products come from a supply chain. We consider a case where there is an information problem about product quality in the downstream part of the chain, but not in the upstream part. We show that the implementation of a label to solve this information problem affects competition in the upstream part of the chain. In particular, competition may be softened up to a point where both the high- and the low-quality upstream suppliers benefit from labeling while all the intermediary producers or final consumers lose from labeling. This result is established on the basis of a simple model with two vertically related markets (a competitive downstream market which is supplied by an upstream duopoly) where the quality of the downstream output is determined by the quality of the upstream input.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL) in its series Working Papers with number
200804.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2008Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:gbl:wpaper:200804Contact details of provider: Postal: Universit� Pierre Mend�s-France - BP 47, 38040 GRENOBLE CEDEX 9 Phone: 04.76.82.54.40 Fax: 04.76.82.54.55 Web page: http://www.grenoble.inra.fr/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Agnès Vertier).
Keywords: LABEL ; IMPERFECT CONSUMER INFORMATION ; VERTICAL PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION ; VERTICAL RELATIONS ; REGULATION ; Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality L50 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports :
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Brian Roe & Ian Sheldon, 2007.
"Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches ,"
American Journal of Agricultural Economics ,
American Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 89(4), pages 1020-1033, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Harvey Lapan & GianCarlo Moschini, 2007.
"Grading, Minimum Quality Standards, and the Labeling of Genetically Modified Products ,"
American Journal of Agricultural Economics ,
American Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 89(3), pages 769-783, 08.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Marette, Stéphan, 2007.
"Minimum Safety Standard, Consumers’ Information, and Competition (The) ,"
Staff General Research Papers
12718, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Stephan Marette, 2007.
"Minimum Safety Standard, Consumers' Information, and Competition, The ,"
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications
07-wp441, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
[Downloadable!] Stephan Marette, 2007.
"Minimum Safety Standard, Consumers' Information, and Competition, The ,"
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications
07-wp441, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at Iowa State University.
[Downloadable!] Stéphan Marette, 2007.
"Minimum safety standard, consumers’ information and competition ,"
Journal of Regulatory Economics ,
Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 259-285, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Darby, Michael R & Karni, Edi, 1973.
"Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud ,"
Journal of Law & Economics ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-88, April.
Evangelos Mitrokostas & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2008.
"Private CSR Activities in Oligopolistic Markets: Is there any room for Regulation? ,"
Working Papers
0816, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Jaskold Gabszewicz, J. & Thisse, J. -F., 1979.
"Price competition, quality and income disparities ,"
Journal of Economic Theory ,
Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 340-359, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Crampes, Claude & Hollander, Abraham, 1995.
"Duopoly and quality standards ,"
European Economic Review ,
Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 71-82, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Crampes, C. & Hollander, A., 1991.
"Duopoly and Quality Standards ,"
Cahiers de recherche
9128, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
Crampes, C. & Hollander, A., 1991.
"Duopoly and Quality Standards ,"
Cahiers de recherche
9128, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
Crampes, C. & Hollander, A., 1992.
"Duopoly and Quality Standards ,"
Papers
92.g, Toulouse - GREMAQ.
Murray Fulton & Konstantinos Giannakas, 2004.
"Inserting GM Products into the Food Chain: The Market and Welfare Effects of Different Labeling and Regulatory Regimes ,"
American Journal of Agricultural Economics ,
American Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 86(1), pages 42-60, 02.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Shaked, Avner & Sutton, John, 1982.
"Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation ,"
Review of Economic Studies ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(1), pages 3-13, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Wang, X. Henry & Yang, Bill Z., 2001.
"Mixed-strategy equilibria in a quality differentiation model ,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization ,
Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 213-226, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Paolo Garella & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2008.
"Minimum quality standards and consumers’ information ,"
Economic Theory ,
Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 283-302, August.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
P. Garella & P. Petrakis, 2004.
"Minimum Quality Standards and ConsumersÕ Information ,"
Working Papers
532, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
[Downloadable!] Paolo G. GARELLA & Emmanuel PETRAKIS, 2007.
"Minimum quality standards and consumers’ information ,"
Departemental Working Papers
2007-12, Department of Economics University of Milan Italy.
[Downloadable!] Paolo Garella & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2005.
"Minimum Quality Standards and Consumers Information ,"
Working Papers
0510, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!] Boom, Anette, 1995.
"Asymmetric International Minimum Quality Standards and Vertical Differentiation ,"
Journal of Industrial Economics ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(1), pages 101-19, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Olivier Bonroy & Christos Constantatos, 2008.
"On the use of labels in credence goods markets ,"
Journal of Regulatory Economics ,
Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 237-252, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? RePEc and its associated services are free for contributors and users, and do not accept any advertising.
This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .