This paper seeks to explain, why Russian (and CIS) economic transformation was neither a shock therapy nor a gradual transition case, but instead followed a sort of middle-ground inconsistent shock therapy path.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by World Institute for Development Economics Research in its series Research Paper with number
29.
Length: 65 pages Date of creation: 1996 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:fth:wodeec:29
Contact details of provider: Postal: United Nations University; World Institute for Development Economics Research, Katajanokanlaituri 6B, 00160 Helsinki Phone: +358-9-6159911 Fax: +358-9-61599333 Email: Web page: http://www.wider.unu.edu/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
Find related papers by JEL classification: P20 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Systems and Transition Economies - - - General P21 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Systems and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)