Economic policymaking in modern democracies generates a great deal of special-interest politics. In policy areas such as finance, trade policy, and regulation, policy decision create benefits for well-defined groups with the cost borne by society at large. Given the difficulties with the aggregation of preferences, social chioces are often ill defined. Such difficulties can be resolved, however, by suitable institutional arrangements. As a result, many reserachers have examined the institutional details of the policy process in order to predict likely policy outcomes.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tel Aviv in its series Papers with number
08-98.
Find related papers by JEL classification: D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan, 1994.
"Protection for Sale,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 84(4), pages 833-50, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman, 1992.
"Protection For Sale,"
NBER Working Papers
4149, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
McKelvey, Richard D. & Riezman, Raymond., 1990.
"Seniority in Legislatures,"
Working Papers
725, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Leonardo Felli & Antonio Merlo, 2001.
"Endogenous Lobbying,"
PIER Working Paper Archive
04-043, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 01 Oct 2004.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Felli, L. & Merlo, A., 2000.
"Endogenous Lobbying,"
Working Papers
00-04, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
[Downloadable!]
Leonardo Felli & Antonio Merlo, .
"Endogenous Lobbying,"
CARESS Working Papres
00-03, University of Pennsylvania Center for Analytic Research and Economics in the Social Sciences.
[Downloadable!]
repec:bep:thetop:v:6:y:2006:i:1:p:1134-1134 is not listed on IDEAS
Morten Bennedsen & Sven E. Feldmann, 2000.
"Lobbying Legislatures,"
CIE Discussion Papers
2000-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Bennedsen, Morten & Feldmann, Sven E., 2000.
"Lobbying Legislatures,"
Working Papers
07-2000, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]