The East Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s has challenged the widely-held belief that international financial markets should be deregulated. The common arguments both for and against free international capital flows are analysed and contrasted. Given the existence of various distortions and market failures in the global economy, there is a case for som degree of control. The extension and sharpening of market-based prudential instruments appear to be appropriate ways of improving control to avoid the type of crisis that occurred in East Asia.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Sydney - Department of Economics in its series Papers with number
99-13.
Find related papers by JEL classification: G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets F32 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Current Account Adjustment; Short-term Capital Movements
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Did you know? All full texts are decentralized with the publishers, none reside on this server, thus making it possible to offer this service for free to all parties.