This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Central Bank Intervention and Exchange Rate Volatility- Australian Evidence

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Kim, S.J.
Kortian, T.
Sheen, J.

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper examines the key characteristics of foreign exchange intervention by the Reserve Bank of Australia in the period 1983-1997. The effectiveness of intervention has come into question in view of the rapidly growing volume of trade in the markets. In the literature, tests of actual effects of foreign exchange intervention are inconclusive and mixed, with many reporting significant positive correlation of intervention on the conditional volatility of exchange rate changes and destabilising effects on the conditional mean. The intervention on the $US/$A exchange rate market by the Reserve Bank of Australia in the post-floating period (since 1983- 97) can be broken into five distinct phases. This paper investigates the changing effectiveness of the RBA's daily intervention on the exchange rate by decomposing the exchange rate response to the intervention into various separate components and finds that the overall effects of intervention on the days of intervention seemed to be destabilizing. However, we argue that lower (or higher) values of the $A and higher conditional volatility on the days of intervention purchases (or sales) of the $A reflect the simultaneity issue; with sustained and large interventions, the foreign exchange market is stabilised to some extent in terms of direction and volatility. Without these interventions, the market would have moved further and exhibited more volatility.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Sydney - Department of Economics in its series Papers with number 99-05.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 23 pages
Date of creation: 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fth:sydnec:99-05

Contact details of provider:
Postal: THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, 2006 AUSTRALIA.
Phone: 61 +2 9351 5055
Fax: 61 +2 9351 4341
Email:
Web page: http://www.econ.usyd.edu.au/economics
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).

Related research
Keywords: EXCHANGE RATE ; CENTRAL BANKS ; FOREIGN EXCHANGE CONTROL;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc encourages publishers to make their bibliographic data freely available to the public.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-20.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.