IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/pennfi/6-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Accounting Techniques and Firms' Equilibrium Values: Tax Methods and the Lifo/Fifo Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas J. Gonedes

Abstract

The effect of firms’ accounting techniques on firms’ equilibrium values is the general topic considered here. The specific technique examined is the inventory-costing method -- e.g., LIFO or FIFO -- adopted for tax reporting. The connection between firms’ selections of accounting techniques and the characteristics of firms’ production-investment decisions is emphasized. Our framework provides a basis for getting theoretical insights into firms’ selection of techniques, for explaining some available empirical results heretofore regarded as somewhat mysterious, and for improving the experimental designs used for work on accounting techniques’ effects. Our results indicate that the optimality of an inventory method is inextricably bound to the characteristics of firms’ production-investment decisions and that all value-maximizing firms pursuing the same type of decisions will opt for the same inventory method. Of course, the same method will be optimal for different types of decisions if the number of methods is less than the number of decision types. In spite of its alleged favorable tax effects under inflation, LIFO is not always the optimal method under inflationary conditions. Moreover, LIFO may be the optimal method even when the expected value of tax deductions under LIFO is less than the expected value of tax deductions under FIFO. Finally, the oft-inferred association between risk changes and changes in inventory methods is not due to a quirk of available sample evidence. It is precisely what one should expect.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas J. Gonedes, "undated". "Accounting Techniques and Firms' Equilibrium Values: Tax Methods and the Lifo/Fifo Choice," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 6-79, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:pennfi:6-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:pennfi:6-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rwupaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.