We evaluate the costs of three different programs for alleviating long term poverty: (i) workfare, or grants made contingent on a work requirement, (ii) universal welfare, or unconditional grants, and (iii) meanstested welfare, or grants conditioned on private labor market earnings. We identify the conditions under which each of these programs are cost efficient and compare them with the corresponding conditions for short term poverty alleviation. We find that the arguments for using work requirements are both strenghtened and weakened with long term poverty. We also find that as the fraction of really needy persons increases, it may be optimal to give up any attempt to screen the genuine poor from the spurious cases, even when screening is made easier by the possibility to observe earnings. (It is never optimal to refrain from screening when poverty is of short term).
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration- in its series Papers with number
9/99.
Length: 32 pages Date of creation: 1999 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:fth:norgee:9/99
Contact details of provider: Postal: NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HELLEVEIEN 30, 5035 BERGEN SANDVIKEN NORWAY. Phone: 5595 9000 Fax: 5595 9100 Email: Web page: http://www.nhh.no/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
Find related papers by JEL classification: H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs J68 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies - - - Public Policy