Pitfalls in Constructing Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Asymptotically Pivotal Statistics
AbstractThe conventional Edgeworth expansion view of bootstrap confidence intervals suggests that for the bootstrap to exceed the accuracy of the normal approximation one must bootstrap asymptotically pivotal statistics. This paper questions the basic premise of the asymptotic theory used to rationalize the higher-order accuracy of bootstrap intervals for asymptotically pivotal statistics. In finite samples, these statistics often are not even approximately pivotal. As a result, Edgeworth expansion arguments for pivotal statistics do not apply, and the only way to compare the accuracy of alternative intervals is by simulation. The paper documents that percentile-t intervals based on asymptotic pivots tend to behave erratically in small samples and may be much less accurate than bootstrap intervals based on nonpivotal statistics. It is also shown that bootstrap intervals can be very accurate in the absence of asymptotic refinements, and that there are huge differences in coverage accuracy among asymptotically equivalent intervals that cannot be explained by Edgeworth expansion arguments.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Michigan - Center for Research on Economic & Social Theory in its series Papers with number 98-04.
Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: 1998
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL THEORY, ANN ARBOR MICHIGAN U.S.A.
TIME SERIES ; ECONOMETRICS;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
- C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
- C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
- C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
- C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Berkowitz, J. & Birgean, I. & Kilian, L., 1999.
"On the Finite-Sample Accuracy of Nonparametric Resampling Algorithms for Economic Time Series,"
99-01, Michigan - Center for Research on Economic & Social Theory.
- Jeremy Berkowitz & Ionel Birgean & Lutz Kilian, 1999. "On the finite-sample accuracy of nonparametric resampling algorithms for economic time series," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1999-04, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.