This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

An Economic Analysis of Household Waste Management

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Choe, C.
Fraiser, I.
Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive model of household waste management policy with three interacting parties: a firm, a household and an environmental regulator. The regulator chooses the environmental tax, the household waste collection charge, monitoring of illegal waste disposal by the household and the penalty for illegal waste disposal.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by La Trobe - Department of Economics in its series Papers with number 97.11.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 27 pages
Date of creation: 1997
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fth:latrob:97.11

Contact details of provider:
Postal: School of Economics and Commerce, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia 3089.
Phone: (03) 9479 3012
Fax: (03) 9479 5971
Email:
Web page: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/business/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).

Related research
Keywords: TAXATION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Gregory DeAngelo & Jeffrey Wagner, 2005. "Characterizing regulation and negligence rule uncertainty in solid waste management," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11. [Downloadable!]
  2. Thomas Eichner & Ruediger Pethig, 2000. "Gebuehrenstrategien in einem disaggregierten Modell der Abfallwirtschaft," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeitraege 85-00, Universitaet Siegen, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften. [Downloadable!]
  3. Takayoshi Shinkuma, 2003. "On the Second-best Policy of Household's Waste Recycling," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 24(1), pages 77-95, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Hiroaki Ino, 2007. "Extended producer responsibility in oligopoly," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 17(6), pages 1-9. [Downloadable!]
  5. Jean De Beir & Mouez Fodha & Guillaume Girmens, 2007. "Recyclage et externalités environnementales : Faut-il subventionner les activités de récupération recyclage ?," Post-Print halshs-00144632_v1, HAL. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Francisco J. André & Emilio Cerdá, 2005. "Gestión de residuos sólidos urbanos: Análisis económico y políticas públicas," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2005/23, Centro de Estudios Andaluces. [Downloadable!]
  7. Walls, Margaret & Calcott, Paul, 2000. "Policies to Encourage Recycling and "Design for Environment": What to Do When Markets are Missing," Discussion Papers dp-00-30, Resources For the Future. [Downloadable!]
  8. Anni Huhtala & Eva Samakovlis, 2002. "Does International Harmonization of Environmental Policy Instruments Make Economic Sense?," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 21(3), pages 259-284, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Rob F.T. Aalbers & Herman R.J. Vollebergh, 2005. "An Economic Analysis of Mixing Wastes," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-094/3, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Thomas Eichner & Ruediger Pethig, 2000. "Corrective Taxation for Curbing Pollution and Promoting Green Product Design and Recycling," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo GmbH. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Chongwoo Choe & Iain Fraser, 2001. "On the Flexibility of Optimal Policies for Green Design," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(4), pages 367-371, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Marco Runkel, 2003. "Product Durability and Extended Producer Responsibility in Solid Waste Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 24(2), pages 161-182, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Walls, Margaret & Calcott, Paul, 2002. "Waste, Recycling, and "Design for Environment": Roles for Markets and Policy Instruments," Discussion Papers dp-00-30-rev, Resources For the Future. [Downloadable!]
  14. Thomas Eichner & Ruediger Pethig, 2000. "Das Gebuehrenkonzept der DSD auf dem oekonomischen Pruefstand," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeitraege 84-00, Universitaet Siegen, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-2.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.