This paper develops a model of budgeting in hierarchical organizations. Each agent (manager) in the hierarchy receives a budget for a task; based on his own information, the agent assigns tasks and budgets to his subordinates, who, in turn, do the same for their subordinates and so forth. Each department's performance is measured by the difference between budgeted and actual cost. In this setting we show that a particular budget mechanism is optimal in terms of the incentives it creates and the coordination it achieves.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Boston University - Industry Studies Programme in its series Papers with number
71.
Find related papers by JEL classification: G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Investment Policy L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Sandeep Baliga & Tomas Sjostrom, 1998.
"Decentralization and Collusion,"
Discussion Papers
1210, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: