The Rise in Union Wage Premia in South Africa
AbstractThe change in the premia earned by African, urban, male, union members, relative to earnings of other, comparable workers in South Africa, between 1985 and 1993, is examined using two independent, national, sample surveys. The interval from 1985 to 1993 was part of a period of rapidly rising union membership for African workers, following the Industrial Conciliation Amendment Act of 1979 which extended the definition of an employee to encompass African workers for collective bargaining. Membership now reported by the unions suggests one of the highest rates of unionization of wage employees among the developing countries. Meanwhile, the simple average earnings of African employees has risen substantially, in real terms, despite extremely high rates of unemployment. In this context, our sample data show that the premia in mean earnings of African urban, male, union members relative to other African, urban male regular employees rose 18.5 percent from 1985 to 1993. Clearly this rise could reflect changes in composition of regular employees and of union membership in particular during this episode of rapidly rising membership. Four apporaches to estimation of the union premia are applied to examine this possibility: earnings equations whith a union dummy; separate earnings regimes for members and non-members; a switching model with separate earnings regimes and endogenous membership; and a multinomial logit model which extends the standard switching model to encompass sample selection into employment as well as into regular employment among the employed. A series of nesting hypotheses are conducted to explore the significance of differences between these approaches. The levels of estimated premia differ widely across the various approaches. However, there is uniform agreement that the union earnings premia, based on either the mean observed characteristics of union or non-union members, had risen by 1993 and that the change in measured characteristics of union and non-union members between sample years actually tended to diminish the premium. This suggests that the observed rise in union premium must either reflect an increase in rents to union members as compared to identical non-member workers or some change in the composition of union members which we are unable to detect in our data.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Boston University, Institute for Economic Development in its series Boston University - Institute for Economic Development with number 83.
Date of creation: Feb 1998
Date of revision:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Azam, Jean-Paul & Rospabe, Sandrine, 2007.
"Trade unions vs. statistical discrimination: Theory and application to post-apartheid South Africa,"
Journal of Development Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 417-444, September.
- Azam, Jean-Paul & Rospabé, Sandrine, 2005. "Trade Unions v. Statistical Discrimination: Theory and Application to Post-Apartheid South Africa," IDEI Working Papers 348, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
- Paula Armstrong & Janca Steenkamp, 2008. "South African Trade Unions: an Overview for 1995 to 2005," Working Papers 10/2008, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
- Murray Leibbrandt & Haroon Bhorat, 1999. "Modelling Vulnerability and Low Earnings in the South African Labour Market," Working Papers 99032, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
- Doubell Chamberlain & Servaas van der Berg, 2002. "Earnings functions, labour market discrimination and quality of education in South Africa," Working Papers 02/2002, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.