IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/bosecd/76.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Licensing vs. Innovaiton Incentives under Uncertainties in Government Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Tarun Kabiraj
  • Chun-Lei Yang

Abstract

We discuss innovative incentives of a local firm when an advanced technology may be available through a foreign firm. The domestic government follows either protection or free trade policy, but there are uncertainties about the realization of a particular policy. We portray the situations in which licensing, either with or without innovation, occurs in equilibrium. We point out that without a binding contract equilibrium outcomes do not always maximize the aggregate industry profit. Also, negative license fee can occur in equilbrium. This analysis is then applied to the controversial question of whether the liberalization policy generates sufficient incentives for domestic innovation. In particular we show that, under the same parametric situation, an innovation decision can be optimal if a protective policy prevails with certainty, while licensing occurs if free trade prevails for sure. The paper also shows that innovation incentives can be strictly lower where the government cannot commit to its liberalization policy so as not to intervene in case of failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarun Kabiraj & Chun-Lei Yang, 1996. "Licensing vs. Innovaiton Incentives under Uncertainties in Government Policies," Boston University - Institute for Economic Development 76, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:bosecd:76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:bosecd:76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iedbuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.