This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Applying Generational Accounting to Developing Countries

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Laurence J. Kotlikoff

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Generational accounting is neoclassical economics' prescription for doing long-term fiscal planning and analysis. Unlike the short-term, cash-flow budgeting that characterizes fiscal policy-making throughout the developed and developing world, generational accounting considers the entire future time-paths of fiscal variables. In particular, it calculates how much current and future generations will have to pay, in present value, to cover the government's current and future spending, also valued in the present. In so doing, generational accounting allows policy makers to determine whether future generations will have to shoulder a larger fiscal burden than current generations, i.e., whether current policies are sustainable. Generational accounting also provides policy makers with a means of identifying those fiscal policy changes whose implementation would promote generational equity.

Generational accounting is being applied to a number of developed economies. This paper describes the results from applying generational accounting to a developing economy, namely Thailand. The paper begins by describing the method of generational accounting, contrasting fiscal assessments flowing from generational accounting with those based on official budget deficits. Next, it places generational accounting in a general equilibrium context, indicating a) the relationship between changes in generational accounts and changes in generations' levels of utility and b) how changes in the fiscal treatment of different generations affect an economy's saving, investment, and growth, when the economy is closed, and its balance of payments, when the economy is open.

The paper then considers, in general terms, why the generational accounts of developing countries may differ from those of developed countries. This discussion focuses on the special demographic and economic circumstances facing particular LDCs, including extraordinarily high rates of population or productivity growth, very young population age-structures, and highly elastic foreign capital flows. It also shows how particular policies being considered by LDCs, such as expanding pay-as-you-go social security or privatizing social security, can be evaluated using generational accounting and how these evaluations are likely to be affected by the special demographic and growth circumstances of LDCs.

Many of the points made in this discussion are next illustrated by showing how U.S. generational accounts would differ were the U.S. facing the kinds of demographic and productivity changes now underway in many developing countries. The paper's final section turns to the case of Thailand. It begins by laying out some basic demographic, economic, and fiscal facts about Thailand as well as discussing Thailand's proposed reform of social insurance. Next it describes the data used to produce Thai generational accounts. It then presents these accounts, compares them with those of the U.S. and uses them to evaluate the sustainability of current Thai policy as well as Thailand's proposed social security reform.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Boston University, Institute for Economic Development in its series Boston University - Institute for Economic Development with number 67.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Dec 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fth:bosecd:67

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 264 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215
Phone: 617-353-4030
Fax: 617-353-4143
Email:
Web page: http://www.bu.edu/econ/ied/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Rangarajan, C. & Srivastava, D.K., 2005. "Fiscal deficits and government debt in India: Implications for growth and stabilisation," Working Papers 05/35, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy. [Downloadable!]
  2. Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 2001. "Generational Policy," NBER Working Papers 8163, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
    • Kotlikoff, Laurence J., 2002. "Generational policy," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 27, pages 1873-1932 Elsevier. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 archives contribute their bibliographic data to RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-16.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.