Will reduced trade barriers increase or reduce the chance that the producers in an international duopoly reach a collusive agreement about not exporting into each others domestic markets? Reduced trade costs increase the short-run gains from deviating from a collusive agreement, but can also make the long-run punishment of such a strategy harsher. In a model where collusion on prices are supported by a trigger strategy, we find a reduction in trade costs weakens competition in the sense that collusion is easier to sustain.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Length: 24 pages Date of creation: 1998 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:fth:bereco:0198
Contact details of provider: Postal: Department of Economics, University of Bergen Fosswinckels Gate 6. N-5007 Bergen, Norway Phone: (+47)55589200 Fax: (+47)55589210 Email: Web page: http://www.uib.no/econ/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
Find related papers by JEL classification: F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Country and Industry Studies of Trade L4 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)