Caitlin Ann Greatrex (Fordham University, Department of Economics)
Abstract
This paper examines the efficiency of the CDS market by conducting a comparative event study in which both the CDS and the stock markets’ responses to earnings announcements are considered. I find that both markets have statistically significant reactions to earnings announcements and both markets anticipate these informational events up to 90 trading days prior to announcement. I further find that neither markets’ reaction to earnings announcements is entirely efficient as there is evidence of both over- and under-reaction to earnings news. However, results are sensitive to both the categorization of earnings and the model used to generate abnormal performance.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Jennifer Conrad & Bradford Cornell & Wayne R. Landsman, 2002.
"When Is Bad News Really Bad News?,"
Journal of Finance,
American Finance Association, vol. 57(6), pages 2507-2532, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)