Dhimitri Qirjo () (Department of Economics, Florida International University)
Abstract
This paper develops a political-economic analysis of immigration in a developed country that operates in a direct democracy regime. It shows that, in a monopolistic competitive environment with differentiated capital intensive commodities produced under increasing returns to scale, labor liberalization is more likely to come about in the societies that have more taste for varieties. This is due to the availability of more and cheaper varieties. It also shows that, the workers and capital owners could share the same positive stance toward labor liberalization. It follows that the latter is impossible in a perfect competitive environment. Finally, in a two period dynamic model with forward looking voters, it demonstrates that the median voter is willing to accept fewer immigrants in the first period, in order to preserve her domestic political influence in the second period due to the naturalization of the immigrants accepted in the first period. Using this strategy, the median voter maximizes her gains from immigration by accepting more immigrants in total at the end of the second period. However, the richer the forward looking median voter, the less restricted will be the policy of the host country toward immigration in the first period.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Florida International University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
0911.