When contracts are unobserved, agents may have the incentive to promise the same asset to multiple counterparties and subsequently default. The author constructs an optimal mechanism that induces agents to reveal all their trades voluntarily. The mechanism allows agents to report every contract they enter, and it makes public the names of agents who have reached some prespecified position limit. In some cases, an agent's position limit must be higher than the number of contracts he enters in equilibrium. The mechanism has some features of a clearinghouse. ; Supersedes Working Paper 05-12/R
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia in its series Working Papers with number
09-10.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Stewart C. Myers & Raghuram G. Rajan, 1998.
"The Paradox of Liquidity,"
CRSP working papers
339, Center for Research in Security Prices, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
Matthew O. Jackson & Sandro Brusco, 1997.
"The Optimal Design of a Market,"
Discussion Papers
1186, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Bizer, David S & DeMarzo, Peter M, 1992.
"Sequential Banking,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(1), pages 41-61, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)