Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The political economy of deregulation: evidence from the relaxation of bank branching restrictions in the United States

Contents:

Author Info

  • Randall S. Kroszner
  • Philip E. Strahan
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This paper provides a positive political economy analysis of deregulation, focusing on the recent removal of barriers to bank branching. Intra- and inter- state branching restrictions had been in place in most states for more than a century but have largely disappeared during the last 25 years. Branching restrictions primarily benefit small and inefficient banks against competition from large and efficient banks. Competing financial institutions not subject to the branching laws also benefit from restrictions on their rivals. Consumer and small businesses, however, tend to be harmed by regulations that reduce banking competition. To explain the shift to deregulation, we argue that a recent series of technological and financial innovations caused a change in the long-standing political equilibrium by eroding the value of the restrictions to the beneficiaries. The development and proliferation of the Automated Teller Machine from the 1970s on, for example, have reduced the protection that the potential winners and losers from branching restrictions to explain the pattern and timing of the deregulation across the states. Our results support the political economy hypothesis. First, states in which there are relatively more small banks are more likely to delay the relaxation of the branching restrictions. Second, states in which the small banks are performing poorly relative to the larger banks are more likely to deregulate earlier. Third, in states where banks can sell insurance, the larger is the insurance industry relative to the banking industry, the later is the deregulation. Fourth, states with relatively more small firms are more likely to achieve deregulation earlier. In addition, we analyze voting on the federal deregulation of interstate bank branching in the House and find that the same factors explain the voting behavior of the Representatives. We conclude by drawing lessons about the future path of financial deregulation and the forces driving deregulation more generally.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9720.html
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9720.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Federal Reserve Bank of New York in its series Research Paper with number 9720.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 1997
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:fip:fednrp:9720

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 33 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10045-0001
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.newyorkfed.org/
    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information:
    Email:

    Related research

    Keywords: Banking law ; Branch banks;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Randall S. Kroszner & Raghuram G. Rajan, 1995. "Organization Structure and Credibility: Evidence from Commercial Bank Securities Activities Before the Glass-Steagall Act," NBER Working Papers 5256, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Kane, Edward J, 1996. "De Jure Interstate Banking: Why Only Now?," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(2), pages 141-61, May.
    3. Allen N. Berger & Anthony Saunders & Joseph M. Scalise & Gregory F. Udell, 1998. "The Effects of Bank Mergers and Acquisitions on Small Business Lending," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business- 98-007, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.
    4. Jarrell, Gregg A, 1984. "Change at the Exchange: The Causes and Effects of Deregulation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 27(2), pages 273-312, October.
    5. Demsetz, Rebecca S & Strahan, Philip E, 1997. "Diversification, Size, and Risk at Bank Holding Companies," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 29(3), pages 300-313, August.
    6. Gunther, Jeffrey W., 1994. "Regional capital imbalances and the removal of interstate banking restrictions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 439-442, April.
    7. Becker, Gary S, 1983. "A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 98(3), pages 371-400, August.
    8. Abrams, Burton A & Settle, Russell F, 1993. " Pressure-Group Influence and Institutional Change: Branch-Banking Legislation during the Great Depression," Public Choice, Springer, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 687-705, December.
    9. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    10. Brickley, James A & James, Christopher M, 1987. "The Takeover Market, Corporate Board Composition, and Ownership Structure: The Case of Banking," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 161-80, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Fredric S. Mishkin & Philip E. Strahan, 1999. "What Will Technology Do to Financial Structure?," NBER Working Papers 6892, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Rebecca S. Demsetz & Marc R. Saidenberg & Philip E. Strahan, 1997. "Agency problems and risk taking at banks," Staff Reports, Federal Reserve Bank of New York 29, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednrp:9720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Farber).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.