IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fda/fdapop/2019-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Los retos de la fiscalidad societaria en la era de la economía digital: el estado de la cuestión

Author

Listed:
  • Julio López Laborda
  • Jorge Onrubia

Abstract

El trabajo empieza identificando los problemas que plantea a la imposición de las sociedades la creciente globalización y digitalización de la actividad económica. A continuación, presenta y discute brevemente las alternativas que, hasta el momento, se han planteado para tratar de resolver esos problemas desde las instituciones internacionales: el FMI, la OCDE y la Unión Europea. Finalmente, el trabajo repasa las medidas que se han adoptado unilateralmente por algunos países, ante la ausencia, o a la espera, de la puesta en marcha de instrumentos de coordinación internacional, deteniéndose, en especial, en las figuras dirigidas a gravar determinados servicios digitales. Este documento no pretende realizar un examen en profundidad de todos los temas que aborda; su objetivo, más modesto, es hacer una presentación suficientemente comprensiva del estado actual de la cuestión. Es necesario aclarar que la naturaleza de los procesos multilaterales abiertos, sometidos a negociaciones continuas, puede dar lugar a nuevos escenarios ahora no considerados.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio López Laborda & Jorge Onrubia, 2019. "Los retos de la fiscalidad societaria en la era de la economía digital: el estado de la cuestión," Policy Papers 2019-04, FEDEA.
    • Handle: RePEc:fda:fdapop:2019-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/fpp/2019/12/FPP2019-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sijbren Cnossen, 2018. "Corporation taxes in the European Union: Slowly moving toward comprehensive business income taxation?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 808-840, June.
    2. Altshuler, Rosanne & Grubert, Harry, 2010. "Formula Apportionment: Is It Better Than the Current System and Are There Better Alternatives?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 63(4), pages 1145-1184, December.
    3. Devereux, Michael P. & Fuest, Clemens & Lockwood, Ben, 2015. "The taxation of foreign profits: A unified view," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 83-97.
    4. Shafik Hebous & Alexander Klemm, 2020. "A destination-based allowance for corporate equity," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(3), pages 753-777, June.
    5. Castillo Murciego, Ángela & López-Laborda, Julio, 2017. "Are Spanish companies involved in profit shifting? Consequences in terms of tax revenues," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 11, pages 1-47.
    6. Alan J. Auerbach, 2017. "Demystifying the Destination-Based Cash-Flow Tax," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(2 (Fall)), pages 409-432.
    7. Stéphane Sorbe & Åsa Johansson, 2017. "International tax planning, competition and market structure," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1358, OECD Publishing.
    8. Alan J. Auerbach & Michael P. Devereux, 2018. "Cash-Flow Taxes in an International Setting," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 69-94, August.
    9. Nicolay, Katharina & Spengel, Christoph, 2017. "The European Commission's CC(C)TB re-launch," ZEW policy briefs 1/2017, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shafik Hebous & Alexander Klemm & Saila Stausholm, 2020. "Revenue Implications of Destination-Based Cash-Flow Taxation," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 68(4), pages 848-874, December.
    2. Robin Boadway & Motohiro Sato & Jean‐François Tremblay, 2021. "VAT and the taxation of rents," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(4), pages 601-621, August.
    3. Johannes Becker & Joachim Englisch, 2020. "Unilateral introduction of destination-based cash-flow taxation," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(3), pages 495-513, June.
    4. Fuest, Clemens & Spengel, Christoph & Finke, Katharina & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Nusser, Hannah, 2013. "Profit shifting and 'aggressive' tax planning by multinational firms: Issues and options for reform," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-078, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Oguzhan Akgun & David Bartolini & Boris Cournède, 2017. "The capacity of governments to raise taxes," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1407, OECD Publishing.
    6. Markéta Mlčúchová, 2024. "Novel Configuration of Formulary Apportionment Using the Correlated Random Effect Approach," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(1), pages 73-101.
    7. Rainer Niemann & Mariana Sailer, 2023. "Is analytical tax research alive and kicking? Insights from 2000 until 2022," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1149-1212, August.
    8. Fatih Guvenen & Raymond J. Mataloni Jr. & Dylan G. Rassier & Kim J. Ruhl, 2022. "Offshore Profit Shifting and Aggregate Measurement: Balance of Payments, Foreign Investment, Productivity, and the Labor Share," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(6), pages 1848-1884, June.
    9. Jennifer Bruner & Dylan G. Rassier & Kim J. Ruhl, 2018. "Multinational Profit Shifting and Measures throughout Economic Accounts," NBER Chapters, in: Challenges of Globalization in the Measurement of National Accounts, pages 153-205, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Wildasin, David E., 2010. "State Corporation Income Taxation: An Economic Perspective on Nexus," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 63(4), pages 903-924, December.
    11. Philipp J. H. Schröder & Allan Sørensen, 2023. "Corporate taxation when firms are heterogeneous: ACE versus CBIT," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(2), pages 396-418, April.
    12. Dhammika Dharmapala, 2016. "The Economics of Corporate and Business Tax Reform," CESifo Working Paper Series 5864, CESifo.
    13. Alan J. Auerbach, 2019. "Tax Equivalences and Their Implications," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(1), pages 81-107.
    14. repec:prg:jnlpol:v:preprint:id:1411 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Raymond Mataloni & Kim Ruhl & Dylan Rassier & Fatih Guvenen, 2016. "Offshore Profit Shifting and Domestic Productivity Measurement," 2016 Meeting Papers 1382, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Dąbroś Wojciech & Kudła Janusz, 2020. "The voting of EU members for common consolidated corporate tax base and the tax benefits," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 7(54), pages 56-71, January.
    17. Richard Collier & Seppo Kari & Olli Ropponen & Martin Simmler & Maximilian Todtenhaup, 2018. "Dissecting the EU’s Recent Anti-Tax Avoidance Measures: Merits and Problems," EconPol Policy Reports 8, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    18. Chen, Xuyang & Hindriks, Jean, 2023. "Multinational Taxation under Pressure: The Role of Tax Deductibility," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2023013, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    19. Massenz, Gabriella, 2023. "On the behavioral effects of tax policy," Other publications TiSEM eb44a9f7-b859-480d-b2e4-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Ernesto Zangari, 2020. "An economic assessment of the evolution of the corporate tax system in Italy," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1291, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    21. Wolfram F. Richter, 2022. "Granting Market Countries the Right to Tax Profit without Physical Nexus," CESifo Working Paper Series 9556, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fda:fdapop:2019-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carmen Arias (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.fedea.net .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.