This paper surveys the main issues in the debate about pensions. The first part of the paper contains some calculations of the future evolution of the pension burden in Spain. The second part of the paper comments on the effects of policy measures that could either control expenditures on pensions or finance it. The main conclusion of the paper is that the Spanish pension system is bound to suffer significant reforms. Different measures entailing both costs and advantages are available. However, there are no simple alternatives like "public system versus private system" or "pay-as-you-go versus capitalisation". First, there are good reasons for maintaining a public pension system offering social insurance. Secondly, most of the advantages associated with privatisation are more apparent than real. In fact, any gains in efficiency which could brought up by reform are more related to the details of how the system is designed rather than with its public or private nature. What is important is to do something, the sooner the better, to eliminate political uncertainty about the pension system. Our discussion of the policy options available leads us to conclude that, most likely, the optimal pensions system is a mixed system, partly capitalised, partly on a pay-as-you-go basis. Both systems have efficiency and equity effects and, therefore, it seems intelligent to combine them in the solution to the pension problem.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by FEDEA in its series Working Papers with number
2000-15.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Carmen Arias).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Michele Boldrin & Sergi Jimenez-Martin & Franco Peracchi, 1999.
"Social Security and Retirement in Spain,"
NBER Chapters,
in: Social Security and Retirement around the World, pages 305-353
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]
Modigliani, Franco. & Ceprini, Marialuisa E. A. & Muralidhar, Arun Sundarram., 1999.
"An MIT solution to the social security crisis,"
Working papers
WP 4051-99., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
[Downloadable!]
Angus S. Deaton & Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas & Christina Paxson, 2002.
"Social Security and Inequality over the Life Cycle,"
NBER Chapters,
in: The Distributional Aspects of Social Security and Social Security Reform, pages 115-148
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)