This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Rural Household Access to Assets and Agrarian Institutions; A Cross Country Comparison

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Alberto Zezza (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Paul Winters (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Benjamin Davis (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Gero Carletto (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Katia Covarrubias (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Esteban Quinones (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Kostas Stamoulis (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Takis Karfakis (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Luca Tasciotti (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Stefania DiGiuseppe (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)
Genny Bonomi (Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Access to assets and agrarian institutions is of critical importance to the economic viability of rural households. Understanding the extent of this access and how it links to the ability of rural households to employ different pathways out of poverty is thus vital for designing rural development policies. This paper characterizes household access to assets and agrarian institutions through the comparative analysis of datasets from 15 nationally representative household surveys from four regions of the developing world. We find that the access of rural households to a range of assets (including education, land and livestock) and institutions is in general low, though highly heterogeneous across countries, and by categories of households within countries. A large share of rural agricultural households do not use or have access to basic productive inputs, agricultural support services or output markets, and in general it is the landless and the smallest landowners who suffer significantly more from this lack of access.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ah854e/ah854e.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA) in its series Working Papers with number 07-17.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 68 pages
Date of creation: 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fao:wpaper:0717

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Agricultural Sector in Economic Development Service FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome Italy
Phone: +39(6) 57051
Fax: +39 06 57055522
Email:
Web page: http://www.fao.org/es/esa/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Gustavo AnrĂ­quez).

Related research
Keywords: rural non farm assets agrarian institutions household surveys.

Find related papers by JEL classification:
O13 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
O57 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. John A. Maluccio, 2007. "The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Consumption and Investment in Nicaragua," Middlebury College Working Paper Series 0722, Middlebury College, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was sponsored from 1997 to 2002 by the Université du Québec à Montréal.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-12.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.