This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Economic Growth, (Re-)Distributive Policies, Capital Mobility and Tax Competition in Open Economies

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Rehme, G.

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper investigates the trade-off between growth and distribution in open economies. In closed economies redistribution seems to reduce growth. I show that in open economies tax competition leads redistributing (left-wing) governments to mimic 'right-wing' policies if capital mobility is very high. In the model 'right-wing' governments are strategically passive and just maximize GNP growth. For domestic left-wing governments it is shown that 'left-right' competition leads to more redistribution and lower GDP growth than 'lfet-left' competition. Efficiency differences allow for higher GDP growth and redistribution than one's opponent. Irrespective of efficiency differences 'left-wing' governments are shown to have higher GDP growth rates when competing with other 'left-wing' governments.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by European University Institute in its series Economics Working Papers with number eco97/24.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 53 pages
Date of creation: 1997
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:eui:euiwps:eco97/24

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Badia Fiesolana, Via dei Roccettini, 9, 50016 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy
Phone: +39-055-4685.982
Fax: +39-055-4685.902
Web page: http://www.eui.eu/ECO/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Marcia Gastaldo).

Related research
Keywords: ECONOMIC GROWTH ; EFFICIENCY ; GAME THEORY ; INCOME DISTRIBUTION;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
O41 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
D33 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Factor Income Distribution
C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Enrique G. Mendoza & Linda L. Tesar, 2004. "Winners and Losers of Tax Competition in the European Union," Working Papers 508, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Enrique G. Mendoza & Linda L. Tesar, 2003. "A Quantitative Analysis of Tax Competition v. Tax Coordination under Perfect Capital Mobility," Working Papers 507, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? A few items listed on IDEAS are over 2000 years old!

This page was last updated on 2009-11-12.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.