IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rdpsjp/09008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation and Allocation of Resources in Higher Education: The Potential and Challenges of Performance-Based Funding (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • TANAKA Hideaki

Abstract

In April 2004, National universities in Japan were incorporated and the basic costs of education and research were distributed to them, by the central government, in the form of a subsidy for operating expenses, without any restrictions on how the money is used. Basically, the subsidy for operating expenses is calculated by multiplying the amount of the previous year's subsidy by certain coefficients. Ultimately, the distribution of the subsidy reflects the historical funding of the former Special Account for National Schools, and fails to deliver an incentive to improve the quality of education and research. Following this criticism, reform of the subsidy for operating expenses has become an important issue, and the Japanese government has decided to distribute the subsidy in a way that takes into account the performance and accomplishments of each university, starting from the next medium-term plan (beginning in fiscal 2010). The purpose of this paper is to analyze the problems relating to the current subsidy for operating expenses and the performance evaluation of higher education, and to discuss the potential and challenges of a performance-based funding for operating expenses that distributes resources based on a performance evaluation. The paper also analyzes the schemes and results of performance-based funding for operating expenses in other countries and estimates the distribution of such subsidies to each university in Japan, when a new allocation rule based on factors such as the number of students and performance is introduced. Under the current system, the subsidy for operating expenses is not distributed fairly to universities in light of factors such as the numbers of students and teaching staff, and the lack of transparency in the distribution rule. In the medium-term objectives and plans, items for evaluating education and research are centered on processes, services, and activities, and there are few performance indicators that measure the outcome and quality of education and research. Evaluation in the medium-term objectives is an assessment of the level of attainment of objectives set by each university and is not based on benchmarks common to all universities. Reflecting these evaluation results in the calculation of the subsidy for operating expenses, during the term of the next medium-term plan, would likely carry the risk that evaluation activities and the allocation of resources could become distorted. There are some issues between the government and universities, such as asymmetrical information and transaction costs, and to resolve these issues and improve the quality of education and research, a hybrid funding system for operating expenses (based on both numerical indicators and performance indicators) should be introduced after clarifying the roles and functions of national university corporations. As specific measures, it is necessary to divide the funding for education and research and introduce a fair and transparent distribution rule based on the number of students and other factors. To introduce performance-based funding, it is important to develop methods to measure the quality and outcome of education and research and introduce a system to control the side-effects of these methods.

Suggested Citation

  • TANAKA Hideaki, 2009. "Evaluation and Allocation of Resources in Higher Education: The Potential and Challenges of Performance-Based Funding (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 09008, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:09008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/09j008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:09008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.