Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Efficiency versus Equity Trade-off: Observations from survey data (Japanese)

Contents:

Author Info

  • MORIKAWA Masayuki

Abstract

This paper sets out observations from economists and the general public concerning preferences for efficiency and equity, and their attitude toward the costs and benefits of government services. The Japanese public has a relatively strong orientation toward equality, and people do not mind sacrificing part of their own income growth in order to reduce inequality provided some degree of income growth is anticipated. There are many who consider it desirable to enhance various kinds of public services, including social security, even if it means bearing a greater burden. This attitude is particularly prominent among elderly people. On the other hand, economists generally support income disparities around their current levels. They believe that expanding income redistribution to correct disparities, and also "big government," would have a relatively large negative impact on economic growth. However, consensus is split among economists, whose positions on specific issues are affected by both their professional judgment as experts and their personal values as individuals. With regard to income redistribution policies through the social security and tax systems, there are many cases of trade-offs between reducing income inequality and the efficiency of resource allocation or economic growth. In such cases it is ultimately up to the people to decide how much weight to allocate and what type of measures to implement. When there are multiple policy objectives, it is important to quantitatively estimate the degree of trade-offs as accurately as possible in order to design the appropriate systems, and to grasp the distribution of people's values.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/08j036.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion Papers (Japanese) with number 08036.

as in new window
Length: 25 pages
Date of creation: Jul 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:08036

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 11th floor, Annex, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) 1-3-1, Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8901
Phone: +81-3-3501-1363
Fax: +81-3-3501-8577
Email:
Web page: http://www.rieti.go.jp/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:08036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (NUKATANI Sorahiko).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.