Enhancing the Convergence Properties of the BLP (1995) Contraction Mapping
AbstractIn the wake of Dub´e, Fox and Su (2012), this paper (i) analyzes the consequences for the BLP Contraction Mapping (Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes, 1995) of setting the inner-loop convergence tolerance at the required level of in D 10 14 to avoid propagation of approximation error from inner to outer loop, and (ii) proposes acceleration as a viable alternative within the confines of the Nested-Fixed Point paradigm (Rust, 1987) to enhance the convergence properties of the inner-loop BLP Contraction Mapping. Drawing upon the equivalence between nonlinear rootfinding and fixed-point iter- ation, we introduce and compare two alternative methods specifically designed for handling large-scale nonlinear problems, in particular the derivative-free spectral al- gorithm for nonlinear equations (La Cruz et al., 2006, DF-SANE), and the squared polynomial extrapolation method for fixed-point acceleration (Varadhan and Roland, 2008, SQUAREM). Running a Monte Carlo study with specific scenarios and with Newton-Raphson as a benchmark, we study the characteristics of these algorithms in terms of (i) speed, (ii) robustness, and (iii) quality of approximation. Under the worst of circumstances we find that (i) SQUAREM is faster (up to more than five times as fast) and more robust (up to 14 percentage points better suc- cess rate) than BLP while attaining a comparable quality of approximation, and (ii) also outperforms DF-SANE in nearly all scenarios. Eliminating averaging bias against more robust algorithms, a performance profile subsequently shows that (iii) SQUAREM is both faster, delivers the best quality approximation, and is more robust than BLP, DF-SANE and Newton-Raphson.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen, Vives in its series Vives discussion paper series with number 35.
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-09-30 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Grigolon, Laura & Verboven, Frank, 2011. "Nested logit or random coefficients logit? A comparison of alternative discrete choice models of product differentiation," CEPR Discussion Papers 8584, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Damiaan Persyn).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.