It is well known that when agents are fully rational, compulsory public insurance may make all agents better off in the Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) model of insurance markets. We find that when sufficiently many agents underestimate their personal risks, compulsory insurance makes low-risk agents worse off. Hence, behavioural biases may weaken some of the well-established rationales for government intervention based on asymmetric information.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Essex, Department of Economics in its series Economics Discussion Papers with number
643.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Benoît, Jean-Pierre & Dubra, Juan, 2008.
"Overconfidence?,"
MPRA Paper
8879, University Library of Munich, Germany.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Benoît, Jean-Pierre & Dubra, Juan, 2007.
"Overconfidence?,"
MPRA Paper
6017, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2007.
[Downloadable!]
Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.