IBSAC (INDIA, BRAZIL, SOUTH AFRICA, CHINA): A Potential Developing Country Coalition in WTO Negotiations
AbstractThis paper argues that IBSA( India, Brazil, South Africa) as opposed to IBSAC (with China) is a far more coherent group when it comes to WTO negotiations as its interests coincide given the agenda that seeks to free trade asymmetrically with the developed countries having to concede more on market access than developing countries and LDCs will have to. The paper begins with the trade profiles of the IBSAC countries followed by a discussion on the evolution of a developing country alliance at the WTO negotiations. The genesis of IBSAC and the phenomenon of growing regionalism are analysed. The possible emergence of IBSAC as a negotiating coalition at the WTO forums is discussed next. The chapter is followed by an analysis on the potential role of a grouping called IBSAC-plus in WTO negotiations.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by eSocialSciences in its series Working Papers with number id:958.
Date of creation: Apr 2007
Date of revision:
Note: Institutional Papers
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.esocialsciences.org
IBSA; IBSAC; WTO; regional grouping; developing country alliance; LDCs; international trade; developing country trade; Economics; Internation Economic Relations;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Cadot, Olivier & de Melo, Jaime & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2001.
"Can bilateralism ease the pains of multilateral trade liberalization?,"
European Economic Review,
Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-44, January.
- Cadot, Olivier & de Melo, Jaime & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 1998. "Can Bilateralism Ease the Pains of Multilateral Trade Liberalization?," CEPR Discussion Papers 1878, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Cadot, O. & de Melo, J. & Olarreaga, M., 1998. "Can Bilateralism Ease the Pains of Multilateral Trade Liberalization?," Research Papers by the Institute of Economics and Econometrics, Geneva School of Economics and Management, University of Geneva 98.11, Institut d'Economie et Econométrie, Université de Genève.
- Sachin Chaturvedi, 2006. "Trade Facilitation Priorities in India and Commitments at WTO : An Overview of Current Trends," Trade Working Papers 22088, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
- Noelle Doss & Helen Cabalu, 2000. "When east meets south: economic gains from India-APEC trade," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(11), pages 1405-1418.
- Nicolas Gravel & Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay, 2007.
"Is India Better off Today than 15 Years ago? A Robust Multidimensional Answer,"
IDEP Working Papers, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France
0704, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France, revised 18 May 2007.
- Nicolas Gravel & Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay, 2010. "Is India better off today than 15 years ago? A robust multidimensional answer," Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 173-195, June.
- Nicolas Gravel, 2007. "Is India Better off Today Than 15 Years Ago? A Robust Multidimensional Answer," Working Papers id:1056, eSocialSciences.
- Laurence Henry, 2007. "Trade and Economic Arrangements Between India and South Asia in the Context of Regional Construction and Globalisation," Working Papers id:1055, eSocialSciences.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.