IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id660.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reform of the Chinese Electric Power Market: Economics and Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Zang

Abstract

To power national development, the government organized electricity production and distribution as a state-owned vertically integrated utility, structured and operated under central planning. Electricity was supplied on the basis of political priority instead of cost, and the single party authority ensured that national economic, technical and social policies were implemented by managers at all levels of the industry. This study has reached two conclusions. First, the capacity growth in the past twenty years was achieved predominantly through continuing economic and political control by the central government. Second, gains were achieved through the medium of an authoritarian governmental system. [ Program on Energy and Sustainable Development At the Center for Environmental Science and Policy Stanford Institute for International Studies. Working Paper 3 (Revised), January 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Zang, 2006. "Reform of the Chinese Electric Power Market: Economics and Institutions," Working Papers id:660, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document125102006360.7655146.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ni Lei & Lanyun Chen & Chuanwang Sun & Yuan Tao, 2018. "Electricity Market Creation in China: Policy Options from Political Economics Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.