IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id1530.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Process, People, Power and Conflict: Some Lessons from a Participatory Policy Process in Andhra Pradesh, India

Author

Listed:
  • Vinod Ahuja

Abstract

A large body of empirical literature highlights the need for stakeholder participation within the context of policy change and democratic governance. This makes intuitive sense and may appear to be a straightforward process of managing conflicting interests, building consensus, and lining up support. The reality, however, is often much more complicated and conflictive, even where there is general agreement on the policy objectives. This paper examines these issues in the context of participatory policy development for the delivery of veterinary services by para-professionals in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. It illustrates the challenges inherent in the politics of participatory policy processes and the potential of ‘agenda hijack’ by influential partners, resulting in missed learning opportunities. It also offers insights on practical steps to counter these dangers, as potential lessons for practitioners and project managers engaged in participatory policy reform processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Vinod Ahuja, 2008. "Process, People, Power and Conflict: Some Lessons from a Participatory Policy Process in Andhra Pradesh, India," Working Papers id:1530, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document11962008540.305813.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umali, D.L. & Feder, G. & de Haan, C., 1992. "The Balance between Public and Private Sector Activities in the Delivery of Livestock Services," World Bank - Discussion Papers 163, World Bank.
    2. Umali, Dina L & Feder, Gershon & de Haan, Cornelis, 1994. "Animal Health Services: Finding the Balance between Public and Private Delivery," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 9(1), pages 71-96, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tambi, N. E. & Mukhebi, W. A. & Maina, W. O. & Solomon, H. -M., 1999. "Probit analysis of livestock producers' demand for private veterinary services in the high potential agricultural areas of Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 163-176, February.
    2. Hubbard, Michael, 1995. "The 'new public management' and the reform of public services to agriculture in adjusting economies: the role of contracting," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 529-536, December.
    3. Kamuanga, Mulumba & Swallow, Brent M. & Sigue, Hamade & Bauer, Burkhard, 2001. "Evaluating contingent and actual contributions to a local public good: Tsetse control in the Yale agro-pastoral zone, Burkina Faso," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 115-130, October.
    4. Jayne, Thomas S. & Villarreal, Marcela & Pingali, Prabhu L. & Hemrich, Gunter, 2004. "Interactions between the Agricultural Sector and the HIV/AIDS Pandemic: Implications for Agricultural Policy," ESA Working Papers 23804, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    5. Townsend, Robert & Thirtle, Colin, 2001. "Is livestock research unproductive?: Separating health maintenance from improvement research," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(2-3), pages 177-189, September.
    6. Randela, Rendani & Liebenberg, Frikkie & Kirsten, Johann F. & Townsend, Rob F., 2000. "Demand for livestock tick control service in the Venda region, Northern Province," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Irvine, Richard M., 2015. "A conceptual study of value chain analysis as a tool for assessing a veterinary surveillance system for poultry in Great Britain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 143-158.
    8. Narrod, Clare A., 2001. "Technology, Policies, And The Role Of The Private Sector In The Global Poultry Revolution," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14567, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Bicknell, Kathryn & Wilen, James E. & Howitt, Richard E., 1999. "Public policy and private incentives for livestock disease control," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(4), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Narrod, Clare A. & Pray, Carl E. & Tiongco, Marites, 2008. "Technology transfer, policies, and the role of the private sector in the global poultry revolution:," IFPRI discussion papers 841, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Riviere-Cinnamond, Ana, 2005. "Animal Health Policy and Practice: Scaling-up Community-based Animal Health Systems, Lessons from Human Health," PPLPI Working Papers 23775, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative.
    12. Claire Heffernan, 2001. "Consumer preferences and the uptake of animal healthcare by the poor: a case study from Kenya," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(7), pages 847-861.
    13. Johnson, Robin & Hillman, Jimmye S. & Petrey, Allen, 2001. "Food Safety Issues, Protection And Trade (With Respect To Meat Products)," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14553, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    14. McMillan, Della E. & Meltzer, Martin I., 1996. "Vector-borne disease control in sub-Saharan Africa: A necessary but partial vision of development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 569-588, March.
    15. Gruère, Guillaume & Narrod, Clare & Abbott, Linda, 2011. "Agricultural, food, and water nanotechnologies for the poor: Opportunities, constraints, and role of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research," IFPRI discussion papers 1064, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Cornelis De Haan & Tjaart Schillhorn Van Veen & Brian Brandenburg & Jerome Gauthier & Francois Le Gall & Robin Mearns & Michel Simeon, 2001. "Livestock Development : Implications for Rural Poverty, the Environment, and Global Food Security," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14006, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.