This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Creating a unified sickness absence series for Britain, 1971-1997

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Tim Barmby (University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK)
Marco Ercolani () (Institute for Labour Research, University of Essex, UK)
John Treble () (University of Wales, Bangor, UK)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We join time-series measures of absenteeism for Britain from two previous Institute for Labour Research Working Papers to create continuous measures of absenteeism covering 1971 to 1997. This exercise provides measures of absenteeism for Britain at the annual, quarterly and monthly time frequencies which may be of use to the research community. The first segment of the data was generated using the General Household Surveys, covers 1971-84 and is reported in Barmby et.al (1997). The second segment was generated using the Labour Force Surveys, covers 1984-97 and is reported in Barmby et. al (1999). Joining the data from these two segments is non-trivial because the GHS and LFS survey methodologies differ substantially from one another and even differ within the surveys from year to year. We seek to clarify the main sources of non-comparability of the two segments of the series over time, and to produce as consistent a series as possible. This exercise has confirmed our high confidence in the accuracy of the absence rate estimated over the LFS sample and diminshed our confidence in the accuracy of the absence rate estimated over the GHS sample. Our reservations over the GHS sample stem from the small sample size and the repeated revisions in the question schedules over this period. Conversely, our confidence in the LFS sample stems from the large sample size and the consistency of the question schedules.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.essex.ac.uk/ilr/discussion/ILRdp030.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Karen Bush)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Institute for Labour Research in its series ILR working papers with number 030.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 16
Date of creation: May 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:esl:ilrdps:030

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Institute for Labour Research University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ UK
Phone: 44-1206-872957
Fax: 44-1206-872724
Web page: http://www.essex.ac.uk/ilr

Order Information:
Postal: Institute for Labour Research University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ UK
Email:
Web: http://www.essex.ac.uk/ilr/discuss/index.htm

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Karen Bush).

Related research
Keywords: absenteeism; sickness; GHS; LFS;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There is a FAQ (frequently asked questions).

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.