Are commonly known beliefs essential for bidding behavior in asymmetric auctions? Our experimental results suggest that not informing participants how values are randomly generated does not change behavior much and may even make it appear more rational.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group in its series Papers on Strategic Interaction with number
2002-36.
Find related papers by JEL classification: D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure and Pricing - - - Auctions C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Michalis Drouvelis & Wieland Mueller & Alex Possajennikov, 2009.
"Signaling without common prior: An experiment,"
Discussion Papers
2009-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
[Downloadable!]