Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 2: results from methodological experiments

Contents:

Author Info

  • Burton, Jonathan
  • Laurie, Heather
  • Uhrig, S.C. Noah

Abstract

This paper presents some preliminary findings from the Wave 2 Innovation Panel (IP2) of Understanding Society: The UK Household Longitudinal Study. Understanding Society is a major new panel survey for the UK. In April 2009, the second wave of the Innovation Panel was fielded. This paper describes the design of IP2, the experiments carried and the preliminary findings from early analysis of the data. The main design features of Understanding Society are outlined and the design and conduct of IP2 described. The results of methodological experiments carried at IP2 are reported and the impact of IP2 on the design of the main survey reviewed.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2010-04.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research in its series Understanding Society Working Paper Series with number 2010-04.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 10 Nov 2010
Date of revision:
Publication status: published
Handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2010-04

Contact details of provider:
Postal: RAB Butler Building, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, ESSEX C04 3SQ
Phone: +44 (0)1206 872957
Fax: +44 (0)1206 873151
Email:
Web page: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Menard, Scott & Elliot, Delbert S., 1993. "Data set comparability and short-term trends in crime and delinquency," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 433-445.
  2. repec:ese:iserwp:2004-26 is not listed on IDEAS
  3. repec:ese:iserwp:2010-20 is not listed on IDEAS
  4. Pudney, Stephen, 2010. "An experimental analysis of the impact of survey design on measures and models of subjective wellbeing," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2010-01, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  5. Gabriella Conti & Stephen Pudney, 2011. "Survey Design and the Analysis of Satisfaction," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(3), pages 1087-1093, August.
  6. Lynn, Peter & Uhrig, S.C. Noah & Burton, Jonathan, 2010. "Lessons from a randomised experiment with mixed-mode designs for a household panel survey," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2010-03, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. repec:ese:iserwp:2013-09 is not listed on IDEAS

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2010-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paul Groves).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.