This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Scharpf, Fritz W.
Abstract

In order to be simultaneously effective and liberal, governments must normally be able to count on voluntary compliance †which, in turn, depends on the support of socially shared legitimacy beliefs. In Western constitutional democracies, such beliefs are derived from the distinct but coexistent traditions of "republican" and "liberal" political philosophy. When judged by these criteria, the European Union †if considered by itself †appears as a thoroughly liberal polity which, however, lacks all republican credentials. But this view (which seems to structure the debates about the "European democratic deficit") ignores the multilevel nature of the European polity, where the compliance of citizens is requested, and needs to be legitimated, by member states †whereas the Union appears as a "government of governments" which is entirely dependent on the voluntary compliance of its member states. What matters primarily, therefore, is the compliance-legitimacy relationship between the Union and its member states †which, however, is normatively constrained by the basic compliance-legitimacy relationship between member governments and their constituents. Given the high consensus requirements of European legislation, member governments could and should be able to assume political responsibility for European policies in which they had a voice, and to justify them in "communicative discourses" in the national public space. This is not necessarily true of "non-political" policy choices imposed by the European Court of Justice. By enforcing its "liberal" program of liberalization and deregulation, the ECJ may presently be undermining the "republican" bases of member-state legitimacy. Where this is the case, open non-compliance is a present danger, and political controls of judicial legislation may be called for.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp09-1.pdf
File Format: text/html
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in its series MPIfG Discussion and Working Papers with number 1.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 27 Feb 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:erp:mpifgx:p0084

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Manuel Schüren).

Related research
Keywords: legitimacy; multilevel governance; polity building; federalism; national autonomy; intergovernmentalism; liberalization; participation; implementation; European Court of Justice; European Court of Justice;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Lewis, Jeffrey, 2005. "The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(04), pages 937-971, October. [Downloadable!]
  2. Vivien A. Schmidt, 2004. "The European Union: Democratic Legitimacy in a Regional State?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(5), pages 975-997, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Per-Anders Edin & Robert Topel, 1997. "Wage Policy and Restructuring: The Swedish Labor Market since 1960," NBER Chapters, in: The Welfare State in Transition: Reforming the Swedish Model, pages 155-202 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
  4. Beate Kohler-Koch & Berthold Rittberger, 2006. "Review Article: The 'Governance Turn' in EU Studies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44, pages 27-49, 09. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen, 2005. "The Europeanization of Welfare - The Domestic Impact of Intra-European Social Security," Journal of Common Market Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(5), pages 1027-1054, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Maskin, Eric & Tirole, Jean, 1999. "Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 66(1), pages 83-114, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Andreas Follesdal & Simon Hix, 2006. "Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik," Journal of Common Market Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44, pages 533-562, 09. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The yearly budget of IDEAS is exactly $0: it relies entirely on volunteer work.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.