This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Representation of Interests, Participatory Democracy and Lawmaking in the European Union: Which Role and Which Rules for the Social Partners?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Annalisa Reale
Abstract

The paper provides for an analysis of the lawmaking procedure, enshrined in art.138 and art. 139 of the EC Treaty, in the area of EU social policy. The legislative scheme provided therein introduced an institutionalised model of participation of "civil society" groups (EU-level organizations of labour and management) to European governance, and, without a doubt, represents an extremely important field of experimentation for new self-regulatory processes. However, it must be assessed whether the current framework of the procedure allows the attainment of the fundamental aim pursued by participatory models of conferring more democratic legitimacy into the lawmaking process. As a matter of fact, the lack of representativity and accountability of the social partners (acting as lawmakers) and the very limited role of EU institutions in the process may endanger the target of ensuring an adequate representation of a wide range of interests, eventually resulting in the paradox of emphasising, rather than lessening, the democratic deficit in the lawmaking process. After having examined the implications of the procedure in terms of normative models of representation, legitimacy and accountability, in a constructive perspective two fundamental changes are advocated: (i) the establishment by the EU institutions and by the social partners of more defined rules of representativity, accountability and transparency of the process and (ii) reshaping the balance between private and public actors in the process -by supplementing the functional representation of the social partners with a wider representation of interests by the EU institutions- - in favour of a more inclusive and fair representation of interests.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/031501.html
File Format: text/html
File Function: Contents/abstract
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/031501.pdf
File Format: text/html
File Function: Part of text
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/031501.rtf
File Format: text/html
File Function: Part of text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Jean Monnet Chair in its series Jean Monnet Working Papers with number 15.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 31 Dec 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0154

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Charlie Pike).

Related research
Keywords: democracy; governance; industrial relations; legitimacy; political representation; trade unions; social policy;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can create your own reading lists on IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.