This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

A General Investment Agreement in the WTO? Lessons from Chapter 11 of NAFTA and the OECD Multilateral Agreement on Investment

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Juergen Kurtz
Abstract

At the recent Ministerial Conference at Doha in Qatar, the WTO member states agreed to commence investment negotiations at the next Ministerial Conference in 2003. Yet it was only in 1998 that similar negotiations in the OECD towards a Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) ended without result. The MAI provisions in turn were heavily influenced by the detailed investment provisions in Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). This paper examines the experience of both NAFTA Chapter 11 and the MAI to draw some suggestions for the investment negotiations within the WTO. The paper argues that there are two fundamental challenges negotiators face in creating investment rules in the WTO. Firstly, it is argued that a WTO agreement must reflect the interests of developing countries. In this respect, WTO negotiators should avoid a MAI-type scenario of simply replicating the very strong investment liberalization and protection provisions of NAFTA Chapter 11. The paper examines the way in which host states typically regulate foreign investment as a means to suggest realistic ways in which to craft an investment agreement broadly reflective of both North and South members of the WTO. The paper also puts forward a second formidable challenge for WTO negotiators. This is to address some of the concerning jurisprudence that has emerged from the NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitral case law. The paper focuses on the way in which some arbitral cases have extended the coverage of NAFTA Chapter 11 beyond de jure discriminatory measures to encompass seemingly legitimate regulations with little adverse impact on foreign investors. The paper concludes with a modest but realistic set of recommendations for a WTO investment agreement.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/02/020601.html
File Format: text/html
File Function: Contents/abstract
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/02/020601.pdf
File Format: text/html
File Function: Part of text
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/02/020601.rtf
File Format: text/html
File Function: Part of text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Jean Monnet Chair in its series Jean Monnet Working Papers with number 6.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 30 Jul 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0006

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Charlie Pike).

Related research
Keywords: economic policy; foreign direct investment; globalization; international agreements; international trade; liberalization; negative integration; non-discrimination; non-tariff barriers; OECD; political economy; WTO;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All top Economics journals are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.