Anti-Unfair Competition Law and Anti-Trust Law: A Continental Conundrum?
AbstractIn the European Union the relationship between anti-trust law and the law against unfair practices in competition raises not only issues of how to properly delimit the scope of application of the rules of both bodies of law, but also of how to divide the exercise of legislative authority over these matters between the Community and its Member States , and of how to deal with divergences existing between the various national laws in both areas. As far as national anti-trust law is concerned , primacy of Community law, as established by Reg.1/2003, will solve the conflicts, but it cannot extend, and the Regulation expressly does not extend such primacy to national laws against unfair competition, thus leaving room for overlap and conflicts. However, it is much less the risk of direct or – more likely – indirect conflicts which needs to be examined, than the impact which the law against unfair business practices may have on the overall operation of competition in the Community . It is with a view to this intrinsic interdependency between the law against restrictive practices and the law against unfair practices that this paper examines both the development of Community anti-trust law and of harmonization of national unfair competition laws. The point is made that , on the one hand, the Community seeks to reinforce the competitive process in the market place even through consumer-related unfair competition law in that, by way of harmonization of the law, it essentially imposes upon Member States the concept of a strictly information-reliant protection of consumers ,and, on the other ,that ,as regards conduct in pure business-relationships, the Community, by a subsidiarity approach, leaves Member States much room to regulate competition on the merits as they see the merits of particular business practices. In concluding, it is argued that such reliance on regulatory competition might well be used to counterbalance a one-dimensional welfare understanding of Community anti-trust law by more freedom oriented concepts of fairness in competition.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law in its series EUI-LAW Working Papers with number 1.
Date of creation: 01 Feb 2005
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.eui.eu/LAW/
economic law; free movement; harmonisation; Single Market; competition policy;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2005-10-22 (All new papers)
- NEP-COM-2005-10-22 (Industrial Competition)
- NEP-EEC-2005-10-22 (European Economics)
- NEP-LAW-2005-10-22 (Law & Economics)
- NEP-REG-2005-10-22 (Regulation)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Machteld Nijsten).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.