Both the European institutional discourse and part of the literature on the Open Method of Coordination have argued that the OMC is based on a 'fully decentralised approach'. This paper analysis to what extent decentralised actors such as civil society organisations and regional and local authorities participate in the OMC in the field of employment. It argues that neither the institutional framework of the OMC nor the reality of participation correspond to the rhetoric. Slightly provocatively the OMC could rather be dubbed an 'Open Method of Centralisation'; 'centralisation' since it leads to the definition at the central European level of policy choices - without broad scope of political debate - that otherwise would be taken at lower levels, and 'open' not in the sense of assumed increased participation of stakeholders and public scrutiny, but merely as being open-ended in its outcomes. Nevertheless, the OMC has some potential to be 'decentralised', on the one hand, by adjusting its institutional framework, and on the other hand, by 'territorializing' the European Employment Strategy through the search of better synergies between employment policy and territorial politics.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law in its series EUI-LAW Working Papers with number
1.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)