This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Benchmarking Innovation Performance in Ireland's Three NUTS 2 Regions

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Roper, Stephen
Hewitt-Dundas, Nola
Savage, Margaret

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The capability of a region to generate advanced technology, information and ultimately knowledge is regarded as the single most important force driving economic growth. This paper provides benchmarks for the innovation performance of manufacturing businesses in the three NUTS 2 regions of Ireland (Border Midlands & West, South & East, Northern Ireland) in 1999, just prior to the start of the current Structural Funds programmes. Consideration of the regional innovation systems of Ireland's three NUTS 2 regions suggests (a) the knowledge generation and diffusion sub-systems of NI and the S&E are notably stronger and more evenly spread than that in the BMW region; (b) the knowledge application sub-system is notably weaker in NI. The implication is that the S&E region has the strongest RIS, having both a concentration of knowledge generating institutions and a relatively strong company base. These differentials are reflected in the innovation benchmarks with a clear regional hierarchy emerging topped by the S&E followed by the BMW region and Northern Ireland. In most cases, however, differences in innovation performance between the S&E and the BMW region prove statistically insignificant, while those between NI and the other two regions are stronger and often statistically significant. Indicators of AMT adoption suggest little consistent difference between the S&E and BMW regions and lower adoption rates in NI. As before this reflects both the structural weaknesses of the NI manufacturing sector and lower plant-level AMT usage rates. Our analysis suggests that in terms of the geography of innovation performance in Ireland there is little clear justification for the BMW/S&E regionalisation and no clear justification for any differentiation in policy or innovation support regimes between S&E and BMW regions. More important is the North-South differential with NI lagging behind the S&E and BMW regions on almost every indicator examined primarily due to innovation performance by plants in the 10-19 employee sizeband.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.erini.ac.uk/act_download.cfm/publication_key/1664/
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Economic Research Institute of Northern Ireland in its series Working Papers NIERC. with number 76.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 44 pages
Date of creation: Oct 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:eri:niercp:76

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Floral Buildings, 2-14 East Bridge Street, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT1 3NQ
Phone: 028 9072 7361
Fax: 028 9031 9003
Web page: http://www.erini.ac.uk
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ellen Moore).

Related research
Keywords: INNOVATIONS ; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
O30 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change - - - General
O31 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Trajtenberg, M. & Bresnahan, T.F., 1992. "General Purpose Technologies: "Engines of Growth"," Papers 16-92, Tel Aviv.
    Other versions:
  2. Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1996. "R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 630-40, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Roper, S., 1998. "Innovation, Networks and Plant Location: Some Evidence for Ireland," Working Papers NIERC. 37, Economic Research Institute of Northern Ireland. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Roper Stephen & Love James H, 2001. "The Determinants of Export Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Irish Manufacturing Plants," Working Papers NIERC. 69, Economic Research Institute of Northern Ireland. [Downloadable!]
  5. Eaton, Jonathan & Kortum, Samuel, 1996. "Trade in ideas Patenting and productivity in the OECD," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-4), pages 251-278, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  6. Veugelers, Reinhilde & Cassiman, Bruno, 1999. "Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 63-80, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Roper, Stephen & Frenkel, Amnon, 1999. "Different Paths to Success: The Growth of the Electronics Sector in Ireland and Israel," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa302, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
  8. Dosi, Giovanni, 1988. "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 26(3), pages 1120-71, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages S71-102, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Stephen Roper & Seamus Grimes, 2003. "Wireless Valley, Silicon Wadi and Digital Island - Helsinki, Tel Aviv and Dublin in the ICT Boom," ERSA conference papers ersa03p62, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by encouraging others to register as authors.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-5.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.