IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/0414.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Costly is Investors’ Compliance With Sharia?

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Hakim

    (Pepperdine University, Grazzadio Graduate School of Business, USA)

  • Manochehr Rashidian

    (Dept of Economics, California State University, Northridge, USA)

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of Islamic-oriented investments has placed an added urgency on better understanding their risk profile. With respect to Islamic stock market indexes, this concern is more pertinent to the extent that indexes could be subject to manipulation, and because they are often used as a benchmark for Islamic mutual funds. Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model as the basis, the paper places the most popular Islamic index under analytical scrutiny, and asks (1) how has the Sharia selection restriction affected its performance? (2) what is the competitive risk-return tradeoff of a Sharia-compliant index and (3) to what extent is a Sharia-compliant index correlated with the broad stock market. Using a ranking based on Treynor’s ratio, the results reveal that the most popular index is competitive relative to the world stock market index but underperforms when compared to another morally restricted and non-Islamic index. The paper concludes that investors in the Muslim index are not suffering a discernible cost for complying with the Sharia restriction. Results add much-needed guidance to Islamic investments in general and help assuage concerns that Islamic indexes have received insufficient investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Hakim & Manochehr Rashidian, 2004. "How Costly is Investors’ Compliance With Sharia?," Working Papers 0414, Economic Research Forum, revised Jul 2004.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:0414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.erf.org.eg/CMS/getFile.php?id=201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.erf.org.eg/cms.php?id=NEW_publication_details_working_papers&publication_id=362
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:0414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sherine Ghoneim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.