The existence of multiple equilibria is one explanation for why some countries are rich while others are poor. This explanation also allows the possibility that changes in political and economic institutions might help poor countries "jump" from a bad economic equilibrium into a better one, permanently increasing their output and income. Experiments can be used to study complex processes like the effect of institutions on economic growth. The control that experiments afford allows structural parameters to be changed, policies to be added and subtracted, and economic outcomes to be precisely measured. In this paper, we study a simple experimental economy in which agents produce output in each period, and can allocate the output between consumption and investment (the experiment builds on the design of Lei and Noussair, 2002, 2003). Capital productivity is higher if total investment is above a threshold. Because of the threshold externality, there are two equilibria—a suboptimal “poverty trap” and an optimal “rich country” equilibrium—which differ by a factor of approximately three in the agent income they create. In baseline sessions, in which agents make independent decisions in a decentralized economy, the economies typically sink into the poverty trap and the optimal equilibrium is never reached. However, the ability to communicate before investing, or to vote on binding “industrial policy” proposals, improves average earnings. Combining both of these simple institutions enables all of the economies to escape the poverty trap. This experimental environment constitutes a platform onto which many more complex features can be added.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Economics, Emory University (Atlanta) in its series Emory Economics with number
0508.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Durlauf, Steven N. & Quah, Danny T., 1999.
"The new empirics of economic growth,"
Handbook of Macroeconomics,
in: J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 235-308
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Robert J. Barro & Paul Romer, 1993.
"Economic Growth,"
NBER Books,
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number barr93-1, September.
Other versions:
Robert J. Barro & Paul M. Romer, 1991.
"Economic Growth,"
NBER Books,
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number barr91-1, September.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)