Consumers often boycott imported goods because they do not approve the way they are manufactured, e.g., using child labor or causing dolphin deaths. Without independent oversight firms must first resist the temptation to employ such modes of production and still convince consumers that they do not employ them. This paper develops a model in which a foreign monopolist uses the price to signal his technology choice in the presence of such moral hazard and adverse selection problems. We find that boycotts and indiscriminate tariffs are effective in addressing consumer concerns, but mandatory labeling of the products is not.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Economics, Emory University (Atlanta) in its series Emory Economics with number
0417.