IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/009007/9422.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intra-regional versus Inter-regional Trade Liberalization for Central America

Author

Listed:
  • Adolfo Cristobal Campoamor
  • Olexandr Nekhay
  • Manuel Alejandro Cardenete Flores
  • Pedro Caldentey del Pozo

Abstract

The countries in the Central American region (henceforth CA: Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama) have signed multiple trade agreements in the recent past. Sometimes the whole CA worked as a unified agent, for instance vis a vis the United States or the European Union. In other cases, some individual countries took the initiative to extend their list of freely tradeable goods and services. CA exports and imports very extensively with the United States (39% of the aggregate exports). However, the recent growth of the intra-regional trade has been especially remarkable: the experts emphasize that such trade generates more internal added value than the inter-regional one, which may allow for higher local welfare and a more favorable external balance for CA. That happens because most of the CA world exports are agricultural goods or products intensive in the use of natural resources. On the other hand, in the intra-regional markets these countries exchange more elaborate preparations (organic agents, medicines, electrical devices, specialized clothing,,...). Our simulations try to evaluate which alternative is locally preferable, taking into account that any intra-regional trade liberalization would stimulate sectors that compete for productive resources with the world exports. To that purpose, our first shock will be an elimination of existing tariffs at the intra-regional level while keeping the protection against imports from the rest of the world. In our second simulation, we will keep in the benchmark model the current level of tariffs within CA, while reducing with the shock the barriers to the inter-regional transactions with the United States. Our intention is then advising the CA authorities as to which range of trade negotiations should be prioritized today. We will adopt as a modelling tool a perfectly competitive, CGE model, in combination with the GTAP sectoral database, which also contemplates the degree of protection in every productive sector. We expect our results will allow the CA authorities to prioritize the removal of intra-regional trade distortions, as opposed to the inter-regional ones, given their different capacity to insert these countries into the international value chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Adolfo Cristobal Campoamor & Olexandr Nekhay & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete Flores & Pedro Caldentey del Pozo, 2016. "Intra-regional versus Inter-regional Trade Liberalization for Central America," EcoMod2016 9422, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:009007:9422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Crist%C3%B3bal-Campoamor.Trade%20liberalization%20CENTRAL%20AMERICA_draft%20%28sent%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcelo Gordillo,Darwin & Schwartz,Jordan Z. & Stokenberga,Aiga, 2010. "Understanding the benefits of regional integration to trade : the application of a gravity model to the case of Central America," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5506, The World Bank.
    2. Richard G. Lipsey & Murray G. Smith, 2011. "Multilateral versus Regional Trading Arrangements: Substitutes or Complements?," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Friederike Koehler-Geib & Susana M. Sanchez, 2015. "Costa Rica Five Years after CAFTA-DR," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22013, December.
    4. J. Humberto Lopez & Rashmi Shankar, 2011. "Getting the Most Out of Free Trade Agreements in Central America," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2322, December.
    5. Cordero, Martha, 2014. "El comercio de bienes y servicios en Centroamérica, 2014," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL en México (Estudios e Investigaciones) 37201, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Zaclicever, Dayna & Durán Lima, José Elías & Terra, María Inés, 2011. "Efectos de las medidas de política comercial aplicadas en América Latina sobre el comercio regional y extrarregional," Comercio Internacional 4339, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Caldentey & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Adolfo Cristóbal & Olexandr Nekhay, 2016. "Intra-regional vs extra-regional liberalization trade in Central America," Working Papers 2016-004, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.
    2. repec:wbk:wboper:22034 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Picarelli, Nathalie, 2016. "Who really benefits from export processing zones? Evidence from Nicaraguan municipalities," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 318-332.
    4. World Bank, 2014. "Costa Rica : Five Years after CAFTA-DR, Assessing Early Results for the Costa Rican Economy," World Bank Publications - Reports 20010, The World Bank Group.
    5. Theresa Osborne & Maria Claudia Pachon & Gonzalo Enrique Araya, 2013. "What Drives the High Price of Road Freight Transport in Central America?," World Bank Publications - Reports 17845, The World Bank Group.
    6. Ms. Stephanie C Medina Cas & Mr. Andrew J Swiston & Mr. Luis D Barrot, 2012. "Central America, Panama, and the Dominican Republic: Trade Integration and Economic Performance," IMF Working Papers 2012/234, International Monetary Fund.
    7. Danielle Gent & Julia Tomei, 2017. "Electricity in Central America: Paradigms, reforms and the energy trilemma," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 17(2), pages 116-130, April.
    8. Su, Kai & Yu, Qiang & Yue, Depeng & Zhang, Qibin & Yang, Lan & Liu, Zhili & Niu, Teng & Sun, Xiaoting, 2019. "Simulation of a forest-grass ecological network in a typical desert oasis based on multiple scenes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    9. Tareg Ghazi Alghabbabsheh & Saleh Saud AlSaif & Md Saiful Islam & Tareq Saeed AlShammari & Ali M A Mahmoud, 2022. "Have Bilateral Free Trade Agreements (BFTAs) been beneficial? Lessons learned from 11 U.S. BFTAs between 1992 and 2017," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Guatemala; El Salvador; Honduras; Nicaragua; Costa Rica; Panama; United States; General equilibrium modeling (CGE); Developing countries;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:009007:9422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.