IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/009007/9219.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic effects of E-mobility scenarios in the context of intermediate interrelations and consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Ulrich
  • Ulrike Lehr

Abstract

The number of passenger cars with electric drives in Germany has nearly quadrupled in the last three years. Even though electric vehicles (EV) still hold less than 1% of the registrations, expectations are high for the future. E-mobility is expected to change the way cars are produced as well as households’ expenditures, as EV could hold 10 to 20% of new cars in 2030. The possible impacts on the economy are manifold; but thus far most studies use microeconomic methods to describe parts of the system changes or they analyze effects of investment in infrastructure. This ignores that manufacturing of cars with electric drives need different – and fewer - inputs than a car with a combustion engine. Therefore, long-term changes in the value chain are going to occur with impacts on the whole economy. In Germany E-mobility is pushed not only to gain or maintain the automotive industry’s shares in the global market but also to use potentials for a greener mobility. The aim is to stronger diversify the energy base in the transport sector and to develop potentials for the use of renewable energies. The objective of this contribution is to show the economic effects of both changing input-output relations and energy use by comparing two scenarios with different shares of electric or other alternative drives in passenger cars. Both indicators of resource use and employment are analyzed on an aggregate and a sector specific level. The analysis is based upon simulation results obtained with the macroeconometric model PANTA RHEI. PANTA RHEI has a macroeconometric simulation and forecasting model at its core, which consistently describes the annual inter-industry flows between the 59 sectors, their contributions to personal consumption, government, equipment investment, construction, inventory investment, exports as well as prices, wages, output, imports, employment, labor compensation, profits, taxes, etc. for each sector as well as for the total economy. The transportation module within the model describes traffic performances of all transport sectors and includes vehicle stocks with fuel or technology categories. Traffic and its modal split are extensively linked with private consumption, intermediate inputs and energy use. To analyze specific implications of drive technologies in cars the transportation module was extended and specific links to the energy use were established. Intermediate inputs between manufacturing industries were changed aligned to the technological transition. To examine the economic effects of a stronger market penetration of EV in Germany our analysis applies PANTA RHEI to two scenarios: a business as usual scenario and a scenario with an increased share of EV among new cars. Both scenarios are implemented in the macro-econometric model PANTA RHEI. The respective differences in economic indicators, such as employment, GDP etc. can then be attributed to more e-mobility in the scenario, since all other factors are held equal. Changes in volumes and prices are fully accounted for. The simulation model runs until 2030. In the scenario with an increased share of EV among new cars the government target of 6 Mio EV in 2030 is met, which is 14% of all vehicles. The long useful life period of cars leads to a rather long term transition. In the business as usual scenario 3.2 Mio personal vehicles with electric drives are operated at the end of the time horizon. The results show that the upcoming shifts in structures of manufacturing and consumption described in the model are not leading to strong macroeconomic effects. In the long term they are found to be negative, as increasing demand in electrical industry is overcompensated by decreasing demand in the automobile industry and related suppliers as well as (traditional) gas stations. Energy consumption in the EV-scenario is lower than in the reference, and so is the import of fuels. The way the well-established automotive value chain is adapting to the upcoming new technologies is very critical for the economic effects in Germany. The strong interlinkages within the automotive industries potentially imply self-energizing effects. Given the past structures these effects are rather negative as capacities for manufacturing electrical drives and batteries are not part of the – often metal-related – sectors. In the scenario analysis employment is higher in the electrical industry and in the energy sector. From 2020 on especially the lower employment in the automobile industry and gas stations lead to a slightly negative or rather balanced net employment effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Ulrich & Ulrike Lehr, 2016. "Economic effects of E-mobility scenarios in the context of intermediate interrelations and consumption," EcoMod2016 9219, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:009007:9219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Ulrich_Lehr_Ecomod2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meyer, Bernd & Distelkamp, Martin & Wolter, Marc Ingo, 2007. "Material efficiency and economic-environmental sustainability. Results of simulations for Germany with the model PANTA RHEI," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 192-200, June.
    2. Lutz, Christian & Meyer, Bernd & Nathani, Carsten & Schleich, Joachim, 2005. "Endogenous technological change and emissions: the case of the German steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1143-1154, June.
    3. Lehr, Ulrike & Nitsch, Joachim & Kratzat, Marlene & Lutz, Christian & Edler, Dietmar, 2008. "Renewable energy and employment in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 108-117, January.
    4. Bernd Meyer & Christian Lutz & Peter Schnur & Gerd Zika, 2007. "National Economic Policy Simulations with Global Interdependencies: A Sensitivity Analysis for Germany," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 37-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz, Christian & Meyer, Bernd, 2009. "Economic impacts of higher oil and gas prices: The role of international trade for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 882-887, November.
    2. Lehr, Ulrike & Nitsch, Joachim & Kratzat, Marlene & Lutz, Christian & Edler, Dietmar, 2008. "Renewable energy and employment in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 108-117, January.
    3. Lehr, Ulrike & Lutz, Christian & Edler, Dietmar, 2012. "Green jobs? Economic impacts of renewable energy in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 358-364.
    4. Paul Welfens & Christian Lutz, 2012. "Green ICT dynamics: key issues and findings for Germany," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 24(2), pages 155-163, June.
    5. Stocker, Andrea & Großmann, Anett & Madlener, Reinhard & Wolter, Marc Ingo, 2011. "Sustainable energy development in Austria until 2020: Insights from applying the integrated model "e3.at"," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6082-6099, October.
    6. Miguel LEON-LEDESMA & Peter MCADAM & Alpo WILLMAN, 2010. "In Dubio, pro CES: technical progress specification and the elasticity of substitution," EcoMod2010 259600104, EcoMod.
    7. Markus Flaute & Anett Gro mann & Christian Lutz & Anne Nieters, 2017. "Macroeconomic Effects of Prosumer Households in Germany," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 146-155.
    8. Dr. Christian Lutz & Dr. Markus Flaute & Dr. Ulrike Lehr & Dr. Kirsten Svenja Wiebe, 2015. "Economic impacts of renewable power generation technologies and the role of endogenous technological change," GWS Discussion Paper Series 15-9, GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research.
    9. Lutz, Christian & Meyer, Bernd, 2009. "Environmental and economic effects of post-Kyoto carbon regimes: Results of simulations with the global model GINFORS," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1758-1766, May.
    10. Dr. Ulrike Lehr & Anke Mönnig & Dr. Marc Ingo Wolter & Dr. Christian Lutz & Dr. Wolfgang Schade & Dr. Michael Krail, 2011. "Die Modelle ASTRA und PANTA RHEI zur Abschätzung gesamtwirtschaftlicher Wirkungen umweltpolitischer Instrumente - ein Vergleich," GWS Discussion Paper Series 11-4, GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research.
    11. Luigi Aldieri & Jonas Grafström & Kristoffer Sundström & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "Wind Power and Job Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Hogan, Jessica L. & Warren, Charles R. & Simpson, Michael & McCauley, Darren, 2022. "What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Bohlmann, H.R. & Horridge, J.M. & Inglesi-Lotz, R. & Roos, E.L. & Stander, L., 2019. "Regional employment and economic growth effects of South Africa’s transition to low-carbon energy supply mix," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 830-837.
    14. Duscha, Vicki & Fougeyrollas, Arnaud & Nathani, Carsten & Pfaff, Matthias & Ragwitz, Mario & Resch, Gustav & Schade, Wolfgang & Breitschopf, Barbara & Walz, Rainer, 2016. "Renewable energy deployment in Europe up to 2030 and the aim of a triple dividend," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 314-323.
    15. Ortega, Margarita & del Río, Pablo & Montero, Eduardo A., 2013. "Assessing the benefits and costs of renewable electricity. The Spanish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 294-304.
    16. Petrick Sebastian & Rehdanz Katrin & Wagner Ulrich J., 2011. "Energy Use Patterns in German Industry: Evidence from Plant-level Data," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 231(3), pages 379-414, June.
    17. Costantini, Valeria & Crespi, Francesco & Paglialunga, Elena, 2018. "The employment impact of private and public actions for energy efficiency: Evidence from European industries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 250-267.
    18. Muhammad Haseeb & Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin & Qazi Muhammad Adnan Hye & Nira Hariyatie Hartani, 2019. "The Impact of Renewable Energy on Economic Well-Being of Malaysia: Fresh Evidence from Auto Regressive Distributed Lag Bound Testing Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 269-275.
    19. Sanya Carley & Sara Lawrence, 2014. "Energy-Based Economic Development," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4471-6341-1, September.
    20. Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2010. "Productivity and development issues of global wind turbine industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1048-1058, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Germany; Macroeconometric modeling; Sectoral issues;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:009007:9219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.