This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Why Economists Reject Long-Term Fisheries Management Plans?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
José-María Da Rocha () (Research Group in Economic Analysis, Universidade de Vigo)
María-José Gutiérrez () (FAEII and MacLab, University of the Basque Country)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Most fisheries agencies conduct biological and economic assessments independently. This independent conduct may lead to situations in which economists reject management plans proposed by biologists. The objective of this study is to show how to find optimal strategies that may satisfy biologists and economists' conditions. In particular we characterize optimal fishing trajectories that maximize the present value of a discounted economic indicator taking into account the age-structure of the population as in stock assessment methodologies. This approach is applied to the Northern Stock of Hake. Our main empirical findings are: i) Optimal policy may be far away from any of the classical scenarios proposed by biologists, ii) The more the future is discounted, the higher the likelihood of finding contradictions among scenarios proposed by biologists and conclusions from economic analysis, iii) Optimal management reduces the risk of the stock falling under precautionary levels, especially if the future is not discounted to much, and iv) Optimal stationary fishing rate may be very different depending on the economic indicator used as reference.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.dfaeii.ehu.es/s0044-con/en/contenidos/informacion/00044_documentos/en_00044_dc/adjuntos/wp2009-03.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of the Basque Country - Department of Foundations of Economic Analysis II in its series DFAEII Working Papers with number 200903.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 03 Sep 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ehu:dfaeii:200903

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Avenida Lehendakari Aguirre, 83, 48015 Bilbao
Phone: 34-946013774
Fax: 34-946017123
Web page: http://www.dfaeii.ehu.es
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Postal: Dpto. de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico II, Facultad de CC. Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad del País Vasco, Avda. Lehendakari Aguirre 83, 48015 Bilbao, Spain
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Cruz Angel Echevarria).

Related research
Keywords: Fisheries management; age-structured models; discounting; Fmsy; Fmax; Northern Stock;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Martinet, Vincent & Thebaud, Olivier & Doyen, Luc, 2007. "Defining viable recovery paths toward sustainable fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 411-422, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Anthony Scott, 1955. "The Fishery: The Objectives of Sole Ownership," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63, pages 116. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Kulmala, Soile & Laukkanen, Marita & Michielsens, Catherine, 2008. "Reconciling economic and biological modeling of migratory fish stocks: Optimal management of the Atlantic salmon fishery in the Baltic Sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 716-728, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. Gibbs, Mark T., 2007. "Lesser-known consequences of managing marine fisheries using individual transferable quotas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 112-116, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There are NEP reports in over 80 fields that deliver new research to your email.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-4.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.